PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYPRX vs. DFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYPRX vs. DFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Premier Fund (RYPRX) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYPRX achieves a 18.06% return, which is significantly higher than DFAS's 16.93% return.


RYPRX

1D
0.25%
1M
-2.33%
6M
7.14%
YTD
18.06%
1Y
23.58%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
6.81%
10Y*
10.96%
ALL TIME*
11.15%

DFAS

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.61%
6M
10.95%
YTD
16.93%
1Y
29.19%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$35.83M$42.77M$37.37M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYPRX vs. DFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RYPRX
Royce Premier Fund
18.06%5.74%2.91%22.76%-15.67%4.74%
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
16.93%8.17%10.21%17.83%-13.84%4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between RYPRX and DFAS is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021

0.94

The correlation between RYPRX and DFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYPRX vs. DFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYPRX
RYPRX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
RYPRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYPRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYPRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
RYPRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYPRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAS
DFAS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYPRX vs. DFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Premier Fund (RYPRX) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYPRXDFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

2.88

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

10.09

-5.41

RYPRX vs. DFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYPRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the DFAS Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYPRX and DFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYPRX vs. DFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYPRX drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, which is greater than DFAS's maximum drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYPRX and DFAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYPRXDFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.47%

-26.13%

-25.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-9.36%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.14%

-26.13%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-26.13%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-1.59%

-2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.25%

-8.08%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

2.67%

+1.91%

Volatility

RYPRX vs. DFAS - Volatility Comparison

Royce Premier Fund (RYPRX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) at 3.36%. This indicates that RYPRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYPRXDFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

3.36%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

11.54%

+2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.70%

16.67%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.00%

20.67%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.26%

20.66%

+0.60%

RYPRX vs. DFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYPRX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAS's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYPRX vs. DFAS - Dividend Comparison

RYPRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.20%, more than DFAS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
0.98%0.99%0.93%1.00%1.03%2.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYPRX
Royce Premier Fund
10.20%12.05%9.52%6.89%9.00%21.23%5.55%20.68%29.26%15.18%13.42%24.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, RYPRX and DFAS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RYPRX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to DFAS (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYPRX dropped -51.47% vs DFAS's -26.13%.

DFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYPRX and DFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer