RYPRX vs. DFAS
RYPRX (Royce Premier Fund) and DFAS (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, RYPRX returned 11.99%/yr vs 15.54%/yr for DFAS. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYPRX charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for DFAS.
Performance
RYPRX vs. DFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYPRX achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly higher than DFAS's 13.73% return.
RYPRX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 6M
- 15.60%
- 1Y
- 27.89%
- 3Y*
- 11.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
DFAS
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 6M
- 14.66%
- 1Y
- 30.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RYPRX vs. DFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYPRX Royce Premier Fund | 14.95% | 5.74% | 2.91% | 22.76% | -15.67% | 5.09% |
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 13.73% | 8.17% | 10.21% | 17.83% | -13.84% | 4.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYPRX and DFAS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between RYPRX and DFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYPRX vs. DFAS — Risk / Return Rank
RYPRX
DFAS
RYPRX vs. DFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Premier Fund (RYPRX) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYPRX | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | 1.84 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | 2.68 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.32 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 3.25 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.96 | 11.14 | -5.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYPRX | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.84 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.37 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
RYPRX vs. DFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYPRX drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, which is greater than DFAS's maximum drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYPRX and DFAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYPRX | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.47% | -26.13% | -25.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -9.36% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.14% | -26.13% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | 0.00% | -3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -8.31% | +2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 2.73% | +1.77% |
Volatility
RYPRX vs. DFAS - Volatility Comparison
Royce Premier Fund (RYPRX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) at 4.29%. This indicates that RYPRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYPRX | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 4.29% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.62% | 11.56% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.32% | 16.75% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 20.85% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.30% | 20.85% | +0.45% |
RYPRX vs. DFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYPRX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAS's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYPRX vs. DFAS - Dividend Comparison
RYPRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%, more than DFAS's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYPRX Royce Premier Fund | 10.48% | 12.05% | 9.52% | 6.89% | 9.00% | 21.23% | 5.55% | 20.68% | 29.26% | 15.18% | 13.42% | 24.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, RYPRX and DFAS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RYPRX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to DFAS (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYPRX dropped -51.47% vs DFAS's -26.13%.
DFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYPRX and DFAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer