RYPMX vs. OCMAX
RYPMX (Rydex Precious Metals Fund) and OCMAX (OCM Gold Atlas) are both Precious Metals funds. Over the past 10 years, RYPMX returned 14.77%/yr vs 18.34%/yr for OCMAX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RYPMX charges 1.26%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for OCMAX.
Performance
RYPMX vs. OCMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYPMX achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than OCMAX's 8.66% return. Over the past 10 years, RYPMX has underperformed OCMAX with an annualized return of 14.77%, while OCMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.34% annualized return.
RYPMX
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 14.86%
- 1Y
- 80.72%
- 3Y*
- 43.06%
- 5Y*
- 17.92%
- 10Y*
- 14.77%
OCMAX
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 8.66%
- 6M
- 18.70%
- 1Y
- 72.79%
- 3Y*
- 52.72%
- 5Y*
- 21.66%
- 10Y*
- 18.34%
RYPMX vs. OCMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYPMX Rydex Precious Metals Fund | 7.46% | 148.94% | 10.14% | 4.24% | -10.57% | -8.96% | 34.25% | 52.91% | -16.56% | 7.04% |
OCMAX OCM Gold Atlas | 8.66% | 168.37% | 23.87% | 4.82% | -17.28% | -9.16% | 45.45% | 58.42% | -13.25% | 10.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYPMX and OCMAX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2010 | 0.96 |
The correlation between RYPMX and OCMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYPMX vs. OCMAX — Risk / Return Rank
RYPMX
OCMAX
RYPMX vs. OCMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX) and OCM Gold Atlas (OCMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYPMX | OCMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | 1.94 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 2.28 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 2.72 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.87 | 7.65 | -0.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYPMX | OCMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 1.94 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.63 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.55 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.24 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
RYPMX vs. OCMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYPMX drawdown since its inception was -81.25%, which is greater than OCMAX's maximum drawdown of -76.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYPMX and OCMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYPMX | OCMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.25% | -76.26% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.86% | -27.33% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.86% | -27.33% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.46% | -45.14% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.81% | -45.14% | -2.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.11% | -17.22% | -4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.37% | -36.15% | -4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.71% | 9.71% | +2.00% |
Volatility
RYPMX vs. OCMAX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX) has a higher volatility of 15.04% compared to OCM Gold Atlas (OCMAX) at 13.66%. This indicates that RYPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OCMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYPMX | OCMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.04% | 13.66% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.48% | 31.51% | +5.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.86% | 38.75% | +7.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.93% | 34.32% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.03% | 33.70% | +3.33% |
RYPMX vs. OCMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYPMX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than OCMAX's 1.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYPMX vs. OCMAX - Dividend Comparison
RYPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than OCMAX's 5.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCMAX OCM Gold Atlas | 5.44% | 5.91% | 2.97% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 5.66% | 24.55% | 6.72% | 18.48% | 0.05% |
RYPMX Rydex Precious Metals Fund | 2.80% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 3.51% | 7.15% | 6.39% | 1.06% | 2.08% | 1.35% | 5.53% | 4.04% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, RYPMX and OCMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RYPMX has higher volatility (15.04%) compared to OCMAX (13.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYPMX dropped -81.25% vs OCMAX's -76.26%.
OCMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYPMX and OCMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer