RYOCX vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
RYOCX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Feb 14, 1994. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
RYOCX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RYOCX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class | -9.21% | 19.51% | 24.34% | 53.31% | -33.34% | 25.85% | 46.80% | 40.33% | -1.36% | 31.20% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -6.64% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 37.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYOCX achieves a -9.21% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's -6.64% return. Over the past 10 years, RYOCX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 17.39%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.43% annualized return.
RYOCX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -7.26%
- 1Y
- 18.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
FCGSX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 33.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYOCX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYOCX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RYOCX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
RYOCX
FCGSX
RYOCX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYOCX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 1.40 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 2.02 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.29 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 2.25 | -1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 10.23 | -5.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYOCX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 1.40 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.61 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.93 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.87 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between RYOCX and FCGSX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RYOCX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
RYOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than FCGSX's 11.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class | 4.71% | 4.28% | 7.23% | 0.00% | 8.82% | 4.47% | 4.17% | 3.80% | 1.86% | 6.00% | 1.75% | 2.03% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 11.22% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
RYOCX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYOCX drawdown since its inception was -83.75%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYOCX and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYOCX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.75% | -38.77% | -44.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -13.10% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.04% | -38.77% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.04% | -38.77% | +0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.31% | -10.42% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.05% | -7.05% | -25.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 2.88% | +0.59% |
Volatility
RYOCX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) is 5.40%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that RYOCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RYOCX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 6.66% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.43% | 13.74% | -1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 23.80% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 23.62% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 23.15% | -0.60% |