PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYNVX vs. UBPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYNVX vs. UBPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX) and ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYNVX achieves a 15.02% return, which is significantly lower than UBPIX's 35.80% return. Over the past 10 years, RYNVX has outperformed UBPIX with an annualized return of 18.31%, while UBPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.73% annualized return.


RYNVX

1D
2.21%
1M
2.08%
6M
13.51%
YTD
15.02%
1Y
28.01%
3Y*
26.51%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
18.31%
ALL TIME*
11.55%

UBPIX

1D
-1.49%
1M
6.41%
6M
-3.75%
YTD
35.80%
1Y
94.18%
3Y*
23.60%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
3.73%
ALL TIME*
-9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYNVX vs. UBPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYNVX
Rydex Nova Fund
15.02%21.42%33.14%35.31%-29.96%42.56%19.64%45.58%-10.24%31.17%
UBPIX
ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund
35.80%88.27%-39.96%53.61%9.98%-10.66%-50.10%13.18%-22.18%46.59%

Correlation

The correlation between RYNVX and UBPIX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2007

0.60

The correlation between RYNVX and UBPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (5 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYNVX vs. UBPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYNVX
RYNVX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RYNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RYNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

UBPIX
UBPIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
UBPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UBPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYNVX vs. UBPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX) and ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYNVXUBPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

4.05

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

9.65

-0.50

RYNVX vs. UBPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYNVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the UBPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYNVX and UBPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYNVX vs. UBPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYNVX drawdown since its inception was -76.54%, smaller than the maximum UBPIX drawdown of -98.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYNVX and UBPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYNVXUBPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.54%

-98.57%

+22.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.84%

-24.09%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.49%

-44.74%

+17.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.92%

-49.18%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.58%

-89.02%

+40.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-90.00%

+89.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.54%

-84.73%

+65.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

10.08%

-6.70%

Volatility

RYNVX vs. UBPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX) is 5.70%, while ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) has a volatility of 10.36%. This indicates that RYNVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UBPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYNVXUBPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

10.36%

-4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.34%

32.66%

-17.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.30%

41.37%

-22.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.14%

45.70%

-19.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.42%

55.62%

-28.20%

RYNVX vs. UBPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYNVX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than UBPIX's 1.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYNVX vs. UBPIX - Dividend Comparison

RYNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than UBPIX's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYNVX
Rydex Nova Fund
0.66%0.76%0.66%0.59%22.11%9.07%0.53%0.00%0.00%1.97%1.22%0.13%
UBPIX
ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund
3.71%5.03%6.94%4.32%10.96%6.00%0.53%1.28%1.58%0.22%0.32%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYNVX and UBPIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBPIX has higher volatility (10.36%) compared to RYNVX (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYNVX dropped -76.54% vs UBPIX's -98.57%.

UBPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYNVX and UBPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer