PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYMTX vs. QMHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYMTX vs. QMHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYMTX achieves a 5.24% return, which is significantly lower than QMHNX's 11.60% return. Over the past 10 years, RYMTX has underperformed QMHNX with an annualized return of 3.10%, while QMHNX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.36% annualized return.


RYMTX

1D
-0.48%
1M
-0.72%
6M
0.68%
YTD
5.24%
1Y
14.70%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
3.10%
ALL TIME*
0.76%

QMHNX

1D
-0.90%
1M
2.79%
6M
3.08%
YTD
11.60%
1Y
27.93%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
17.74%
10Y*
4.36%
ALL TIME*
5.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYMTX vs. QMHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYMTX
Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund
5.24%5.52%0.56%3.62%14.75%2.62%2.07%7.18%-7.87%7.39%
QMHNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N
11.60%19.65%10.48%-0.40%49.64%-2.30%-0.85%1.55%-14.59%-2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RYMTX and QMHNX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.62

The correlation between RYMTX and QMHNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYMTX vs. QMHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYMTX
RYMTX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RYMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

QMHNX
QMHNX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QMHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QMHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYMTX vs. QMHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYMTXQMHNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.41

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

11.51

-3.33

RYMTX vs. QMHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYMTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the QMHNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYMTX and QMHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYMTX vs. QMHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYMTX drawdown since its inception was -34.19%, smaller than the maximum QMHNX drawdown of -40.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYMTX and QMHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYMTXQMHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.19%

-40.29%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.43%

-8.74%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-19.23%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.54%

-19.23%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.54%

-33.81%

+16.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.39%

-6.19%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.75%

-18.10%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.59%

-0.68%

Volatility

RYMTX vs. QMHNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) is 2.39%, while AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that RYMTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYMTXQMHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

5.10%

-2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.62%

10.63%

-3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.48%

13.97%

-2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.05%

17.26%

-5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.64%

15.30%

-4.66%

RYMTX vs. QMHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYMTX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QMHNX's 4.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYMTX vs. QMHNX - Dividend Comparison

RYMTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, more than QMHNX's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QMHNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N
1.69%1.89%2.09%7.36%8.75%10.64%7.79%3.80%0.00%0.00%0.01%7.47%
RYMTX
Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund
5.73%6.03%5.10%1.02%4.80%0.00%7.56%0.00%0.00%4.70%5.19%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYMTX and QMHNX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QMHNX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to RYMTX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYMTX dropped -34.19% vs QMHNX's -40.29%.

QMHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYMTX and QMHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer