PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYMMX vs. RMQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYMMX vs. RMQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund (RYMMX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYMMX achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly lower than RMQAX's 38.84% return. Over the past 10 years, RYMMX has underperformed RMQAX with an annualized return of 9.67%, while RMQAX has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.


RYMMX

1D
0.70%
1M
0.96%
YTD
10.57%
6M
9.12%
1Y
22.77%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
9.67%

RMQAX

1D
1.16%
1M
19.81%
YTD
38.84%
6M
35.01%
1Y
84.61%
3Y*
50.71%
5Y*
26.56%
10Y*
37.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYMMX vs. RMQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYMMX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund
10.57%5.11%3.49%26.78%-6.06%30.05%5.74%20.83%-19.66%12.28%
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
38.84%33.92%44.76%115.91%-59.93%56.36%101.06%80.80%-7.28%69.80%

Correlation

The correlation between RYMMX and RMQAX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.57

The correlation between RYMMX and RMQAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYMMX vs. RMQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYMMX
RYMMX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
RYMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

RMQAX
RMQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RMQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYMMX vs. RMQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund (RYMMX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYMMXRMQAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

2.73

-1.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

3.18

-1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.42

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

3.48

-1.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.83

12.60

-7.77

RYMMX vs. RMQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYMMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the RMQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYMMX and RMQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYMMXRMQAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

2.73

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.58

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.81

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.75

-0.48

Drawdowns

RYMMX vs. RMQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYMMX drawdown since its inception was -73.49%, which is greater than RMQAX's maximum drawdown of -63.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYMMX and RMQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYMMXRMQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.49%

-63.18%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.54%

-24.96%

+12.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.11%

-42.45%

+17.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

-63.18%

+38.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.43%

-63.18%

+8.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

0.00%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.98%

-12.91%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

6.89%

-2.54%

Volatility

RYMMX vs. RMQAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund (RYMMX) is 4.42%, while Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that RYMMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYMMXRMQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

8.62%

-4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

24.34%

-12.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.05%

32.21%

-14.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.93%

46.18%

-24.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.02%

46.42%

-21.40%

RYMMX vs. RMQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYMMX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than RMQAX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYMMX vs. RMQAX - Dividend Comparison

RYMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than RMQAX's 26.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
26.12%36.27%26.02%3.76%0.00%2.18%5.30%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYMMX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund
0.17%0.18%8.21%0.48%17.90%6.82%0.05%0.00%3.84%1.94%0.22%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYMMX and RMQAX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMQAX has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to RYMMX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYMMX dropped -73.49% vs RMQAX's -63.18%.

RMQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYMMX and RMQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer