RYMMX vs. RYCKX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RYMMX (Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund) and RYCKX (Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - RYMMX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Rydex Funds, while RYCKX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Rydex Funds. Over the past 10 years, RYMMX returned 10.06%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for RYCKX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 2.26% expense ratio.

Performance

RYMMX vs. RYCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund (RYMMX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYMMX achieves a 11.30% return, which is significantly lower than RYCKX's 21.97% return. Over the past 10 years, RYMMX has outperformed RYCKX with an annualized return of 10.06%, while RYCKX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.92% annualized return.

RYMMX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: 11.30%
• 6M: 10.10%
• 1Y: 19.31%
• 3Y*: 12.57%
• 5Y*: 8.60%
• 10Y*: 10.06%

RYCKX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 4.65%
• YTD: 21.97%
• 6M: 19.17%
• 1Y: 33.08%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 6.05%
• 10Y*: 8.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYMMX vs. RYCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYMMX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund	11.30%	5.11%	3.49%	26.78%	-6.06%	30.05%	5.74%	20.83%	-19.66%	12.28%
RYCKX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund	21.97%	6.61%	15.10%	13.97%	-23.05%	11.26%	29.72%	14.60%	-15.17%	18.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RYMMX and RYCKX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005	0.84

The correlation between RYMMX and RYCKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RYMMX vs. RYCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYMMX

RYMMX Risk / Return Rank: 19
RYMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
RYMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
RYMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
RYMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
RYMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

RYCKX

RYCKX Risk / Return Rank: 51
RYCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
RYCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
RYCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
RYCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
RYCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYMMX vs. RYCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund (RYMMX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RYMMX	RYCKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.73	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	2.45	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.30	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	3.12	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.54	12.52	-7.98

RYMMX vs. RYCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYMMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the RYCKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYMMX and RYCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RYMMX vs. RYCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYMMX drawdown since its inception was -73.49%, which is greater than RYCKX's maximum drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYMMX and RYCKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYMMX	RYCKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.49%	-52.60%	-20.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.54%	-10.50%	-2.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.11%	-27.14%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.11%	-35.98%	+10.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.43%	-44.75%	-9.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.67%	0.00%	-2.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.95%	-9.49%	-2.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.36%	2.62%	+1.74%

Volatility

RYMMX vs. RYCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund (RYMMX) is 4.42%, while Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that RYMMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYMMX	RYCKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	6.34%	-1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.91%	15.39%	-3.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.05%	19.04%	-0.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.85%	22.87%	-1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.02%	23.12%	+1.90%

RYMMX vs. RYCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RYMMX and RYCKX have an expense ratio of 2.26%.

Dividends

RYMMX vs. RYCKX - Dividend Comparison

RYMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while RYCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RYCKX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	20.92%	0.00%	14.34%	13.66%	1.29%	0.00%	18.93%	7.60%	1.72%	5.90%
RYMMX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund	0.16%	0.18%	8.21%	0.48%	17.90%	6.82%	0.05%	0.00%	3.84%	1.94%	0.22%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYMMX and RYCKX in my portfolio?

RYMMX and RYCKX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYMMX or RYCKX?

RYCKX has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to RYMMX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYMMX dropped -73.49% vs RYCKX's -52.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.