PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMQAX vs. DXQLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMQAX vs. DXQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMQAX achieves a 37.58% return, which is significantly higher than DXQLX's 33.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQAX has outperformed DXQLX with an annualized return of 38.05%, while DXQLX has yielded a comparatively lower 35.84% annualized return.


RMQAX

1D
4.97%
1M
5.59%
YTD
37.58%
6M
35.14%
1Y
81.04%
3Y*
46.90%
5Y*
25.00%
10Y*
38.05%

DXQLX

1D
4.37%
1M
4.98%
YTD
33.20%
6M
31.15%
1Y
69.94%
3Y*
41.20%
5Y*
21.69%
10Y*
35.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMQAX vs. DXQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
37.58%33.92%44.76%115.91%-59.93%56.36%101.06%80.80%-7.28%69.80%
DXQLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund
33.20%29.99%39.26%97.59%-57.72%55.98%100.94%79.36%-81.54%743.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RMQAX and DXQLX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.99

The correlation between RMQAX and DXQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMQAX vs. DXQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMQAX
RMQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RMQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DXQLX
DXQLX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DXQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DXQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMQAX vs. DXQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMQAXDXQLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.36

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.15

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.28

11.23

+0.05

RMQAX vs. DXQLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the DXQLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMQAX and DXQLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMQAX vs. DXQLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMQAX drawdown since its inception was -63.18%, smaller than the maximum DXQLX drawdown of -96.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQAX and DXQLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMQAXDXQLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.18%

-96.04%

+32.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.96%

-21.88%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.45%

-37.99%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.18%

-60.79%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.18%

-87.23%

+24.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-1.59%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-51.49%

+38.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.07%

6.13%

+0.94%

Volatility

RMQAX vs. DXQLX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) has a higher volatility of 17.26% compared to Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) at 15.11%. This indicates that RMQAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMQAXDXQLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.26%

15.11%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.87%

25.22%

+3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.56%

31.07%

+4.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.67%

42.52%

+4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.66%

138.77%

-92.11%

RMQAX vs. DXQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMQAX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is lower than DXQLX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMQAX vs. DXQLX - Dividend Comparison

RMQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.36%, more than DXQLX's 11.11% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXQLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund
11.11%14.50%0.33%0.00%0.00%11.75%10.90%3.37%7.37%5.72%
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
26.36%36.27%26.02%3.76%0.00%2.18%5.30%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, RMQAX and DXQLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RMQAX has higher volatility (17.26%) compared to DXQLX (15.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMQAX dropped -63.18% vs DXQLX's -96.04%.

RMQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMQAX and DXQLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer