PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYMKX vs. UTPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYMKX vs. UTPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMKX) and ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYMKX achieves a 26.33% return, which is significantly higher than UTPIX's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, RYMKX has outperformed UTPIX with an annualized return of 10.59%, while UTPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.13% annualized return.


RYMKX

1D
2.04%
1M
-2.80%
6M
17.23%
YTD
26.33%
1Y
52.46%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
10.59%
ALL TIME*
8.08%

UTPIX

1D
-0.80%
1M
-3.90%
6M
3.82%
YTD
5.49%
1Y
4.94%
3Y*
13.88%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
8.13%
ALL TIME*
6.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYMKX vs. UTPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYMKX
Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund
26.33%12.79%11.00%20.06%-33.16%16.62%20.94%35.38%-19.62%20.07%
UTPIX
ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund
5.49%19.28%27.74%-15.46%-2.31%23.33%-8.87%34.24%2.30%15.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RYMKX and UTPIX is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between RYMKX and UTPIX has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYMKX vs. UTPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYMKX
RYMKX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RYMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

UTPIX
UTPIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
UTPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
UTPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYMKX vs. UTPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMKX) and ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYMKXUTPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.06

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

0.41

+2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

0.82

+8.54

RYMKX vs. UTPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the UTPIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYMKX and UTPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYMKX vs. UTPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYMKX drawdown since its inception was -77.57%, which is greater than UTPIX's maximum drawdown of -73.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYMKX and UTPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYMKXUTPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.57%

-73.56%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.96%

-14.82%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.72%

-19.43%

-20.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.65%

-38.73%

-24.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.65%

-50.82%

-12.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.14%

-10.04%

-11.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.34%

-21.82%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

7.45%

-2.54%

Volatility

RYMKX vs. UTPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMKX) is 5.74%, while ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that RYMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYMKXUTPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

7.21%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.19%

18.33%

+2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.11%

22.79%

+6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.40%

26.07%

+19.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.13%

29.13%

+12.00%

RYMKX vs. UTPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYMKX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is lower than UTPIX's 1.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYMKX vs. UTPIX - Dividend Comparison

RYMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than UTPIX's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYMKX
Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund
0.66%0.84%1.30%0.21%0.00%57.14%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.87%8.26%
UTPIX
ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund
0.73%0.77%0.00%1.74%0.97%0.20%0.58%1.72%0.66%0.74%0.83%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYMKX and UTPIX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTPIX has higher volatility (7.21%) compared to RYMKX (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYMKX dropped -77.57% vs UTPIX's -73.56%.

RYMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYMKX and UTPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer