PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYMKX vs. RYURX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYMKX vs. RYURX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMKX) and Rydex Inverse S&P 500 Strategy Fund (RYURX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYMKX achieves a 26.33% return, which is significantly higher than RYURX's -6.06% return. Over the past 10 years, RYMKX has outperformed RYURX with an annualized return of 10.59%, while RYURX has yielded a comparatively lower -12.47% annualized return.


RYMKX

1D
2.04%
1M
-2.80%
6M
17.23%
YTD
26.33%
1Y
52.46%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
10.59%
ALL TIME*
8.08%

RYURX

1D
-1.56%
1M
0.93%
6M
-5.19%
YTD
-6.06%
1Y
-12.58%
3Y*
-10.49%
5Y*
-7.99%
10Y*
-12.47%
ALL TIME*
-10.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYMKX vs. RYURX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYMKX
Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund
26.33%12.79%11.00%20.06%-33.16%16.62%20.94%35.38%-19.62%20.07%
RYURX
Rydex Inverse S&P 500 Strategy Fund
-6.06%-11.41%-13.04%-14.56%17.56%-24.19%-24.90%-22.65%4.33%-17.38%

Correlation

The correlation between RYMKX and RYURX is -0.80, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

-0.86

The correlation between RYMKX and RYURX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.86 to -0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYMKX vs. RYURX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYMKX
RYMKX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RYMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

RYURX
RYURX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
RYURX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYURX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYURX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
RYURX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYURX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYMKX vs. RYURX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMKX) and Rydex Inverse S&P 500 Strategy Fund (RYURX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYMKXRYURXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.87

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

-0.67

+3.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

-1.21

+10.57

RYMKX vs. RYURX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the RYURX Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYMKX and RYURX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYMKX vs. RYURX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYMKX drawdown since its inception was -77.57%, smaller than the maximum RYURX drawdown of -96.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYMKX and RYURX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYMKXRYURXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.57%

-96.72%

+19.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.96%

-16.08%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.72%

-38.48%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.65%

-44.10%

-19.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.65%

-75.17%

+11.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.14%

-96.63%

+75.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.34%

-69.05%

+45.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

8.97%

-4.06%

Volatility

RYMKX vs. RYURX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMKX) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to Rydex Inverse S&P 500 Strategy Fund (RYURX) at 3.38%. This indicates that RYMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYURX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYMKXRYURXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

3.38%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.19%

10.05%

+11.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.11%

12.78%

+16.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.40%

17.11%

+28.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.13%

18.11%

+23.02%

RYMKX vs. RYURX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYMKX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than RYURX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYMKX vs. RYURX - Dividend Comparison

RYMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than RYURX's 4.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYMKX
Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund
0.66%0.84%1.30%0.21%0.00%57.14%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.87%8.26%
RYURX
Rydex Inverse S&P 500 Strategy Fund
4.06%3.82%6.78%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.42%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYMKX and RYURX have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYMKX has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to RYURX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYMKX dropped -77.57% vs RYURX's -96.72%.

RYMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYMKX and RYURX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer