RYLIX vs. FDLSX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RYLIX (Rydex Leisure Fund) and FDLSX (Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RYLIX returned 6.74%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for FDLSX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYLIX charges 1.39%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FDLSX.

Performance

RYLIX vs. FDLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Leisure Fund (RYLIX) and Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYLIX achieves a -4.01% return, which is significantly higher than FDLSX's -6.96% return. Over the past 10 years, RYLIX has underperformed FDLSX with an annualized return of 6.74%, while FDLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.77% annualized return.

RYLIX

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: -4.01%
• 6M: -1.78%
• 1Y: -0.64%
• 3Y*: 10.13%
• 5Y*: -0.26%
• 10Y*: 6.74%

FDLSX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: -6.96%
• 6M: -13.94%
• 1Y: -17.46%
• 3Y*: 5.75%
• 5Y*: 4.78%
• 10Y*: 10.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYLIX vs. FDLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYLIX Rydex Leisure Fund	-4.01%	8.99%	17.03%	22.86%	-26.98%	0.91%	21.26%	29.89%	-13.22%	20.52%
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio	-6.96%	-5.30%	20.17%	30.14%	-15.27%	21.66%	18.59%	28.78%	-7.65%	29.09%

Correlation

The correlation between RYLIX and FDLSX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999	0.90

The correlation between RYLIX and FDLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RYLIX vs. FDLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYLIX

RYLIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
RYLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
RYLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
RYLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
RYLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
RYLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FDLSX

FDLSX Risk / Return Rank: 1
FDLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYLIX vs. FDLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Leisure Fund (RYLIX) and Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RYLIX	FDLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	-0.82	+0.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.05	-1.00	+1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.87	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.01	-0.60	+0.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.02	-1.09	+1.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RYLIX vs. FDLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYLIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is higher than the FDLSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYLIX and FDLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RYLIX	FDLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04	-0.82	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.22	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.48	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.66	-0.43

Drawdowns

RYLIX vs. FDLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYLIX drawdown since its inception was -68.20%, which is greater than FDLSX's maximum drawdown of -51.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLIX and FDLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYLIX	FDLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.20%	-51.58%	-16.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.04%	-28.33%	+14.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.18%	-28.33%	+9.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.12%	-28.33%	-11.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.27%	-48.44%	+6.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.47%	-23.75%	+15.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.38%	-8.93%	-7.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.22%	15.62%	-9.40%

Volatility

RYLIX vs. FDLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Leisure Fund (RYLIX) is 3.85%, while Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that RYLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYLIX	FDLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	5.89%	-2.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.20%	18.27%	-8.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.02%	21.28%	-7.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.88%	21.50%	-1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.06%	22.34%	-2.28%

RYLIX vs. FDLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYLIX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FDLSX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYLIX vs. FDLSX - Dividend Comparison

RYLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than FDLSX's 5.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio	5.55%	9.12%	7.41%	1.64%	3.32%	22.77%	2.36%	6.43%	19.76%	6.33%	1.01%	5.42%
RYLIX Rydex Leisure Fund	0.06%	0.06%	0.43%	0.06%	0.00%	6.14%	0.00%	0.24%	8.04%	6.23%	0.49%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYLIX and FDLSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, RYLIX and FDLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RYLIX or FDLSX?

FDLSX has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to RYLIX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYLIX dropped -68.20% vs FDLSX's -51.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.