PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYLG vs. IPDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RYLG vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RYLG vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


RYLG

1D
2.64%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
0.64%
6M
4.08%
1Y
18.22%
3Y*
9.48%
5Y*
10Y*

IPDP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RYLG vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RYLG vs. IPDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYLG
RYLG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IPDP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYLG vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYLGIPDPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.15

RYLG vs. IPDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYLGIPDPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

Dividends

RYLG vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

RYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.35%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
RYLG
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
11.35%10.82%23.73%5.78%4.36%
IPDP
Dividend Performers ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RYLG vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYLG drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLG and IPDP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RYLGIPDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.37%

0.00%

-22.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.75%

0.00%

-5.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

0.00%

-4.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

Volatility

RYLG vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RYLGIPDPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.62%

0.00%

+19.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

0.00%

+17.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

0.00%

+17.36%