RYLG vs. IWMW
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) and iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW).
RYLG and IWMW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2022. IWMW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cboe FTSE Russell IWM 2% OTM BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Mar 14, 2024. Both RYLG and IWMW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RYLG or IWMW.
Correlation
The correlation between RYLG and IWMW is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RYLG vs. IWMW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RYLG:
15.01%
IWMW:
13.66%
RYLG:
-14.27%
IWMW:
-8.35%
RYLG:
-2.22%
IWMW:
-0.87%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYLG achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly lower than IWMW's 4.65% return.
RYLG
3.13%
1.14%
8.97%
13.58%
N/A
N/A
IWMW
4.65%
2.43%
11.46%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYLG vs. IWMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMW's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RYLG vs. IWMW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RYLG
IWMW
RYLG vs. IWMW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) and iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
RYLG vs. IWMW - Dividend Comparison
RYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.08%, more than IWMW's 18.86% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RYLG Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 23.08% | 23.73% | 5.78% | 4.37% |
IWMW iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF | 18.86% | 17.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RYLG vs. IWMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYLG drawdown since its inception was -14.27%, which is greater than IWMW's maximum drawdown of -8.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLG and IWMW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RYLG vs. IWMW - Volatility Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) at 2.42%. This indicates that RYLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.