RYJ vs. USMF
RYJ (Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF) and USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - RYJ tracks the Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index while USMF tracks the WisdomTree US Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RYJ returned 7.34%/yr vs 7.97%/yr for USMF. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYJ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for USMF.
Performance
RYJ vs. USMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYJ achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than USMF's 4.94% return.
RYJ
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 12.45%
- 1Y
- 18.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
USMF
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- 4.94%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- 14.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- —
RYJ vs. USMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 11.22% | 8.89% | 13.28% | 15.65% | -13.17% | 24.09% | 6.21% | 32.02% | -14.84% | 12.14% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 4.94% | 4.60% | 19.65% | 13.47% | -8.82% | 21.26% | 12.01% | 24.06% | -4.72% | 11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYJ and USMF is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between RYJ and USMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
RYJ vs. USMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RYJ
USMF
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
RYJ
USMF
Industrials
RYJ
USMF
Utilities
RYJ
USMF
Consumer Cyclical
RYJ
USMF
Technology
RYJ
USMF
Communication Services
RYJ
USMF
Healthcare
RYJ
USMF
Energy
RYJ
USMF
Basic Materials
RYJ
USMF
Financial Services
RYJ
-
USMF
Real Estate
RYJ
-
USMF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYJ vs. USMF — Risk / Return Rank
RYJ
USMF
RYJ vs. USMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYJ | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 0.68 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 1.02 | +1.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.12 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 1.11 | +0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 3.35 | +3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYJ | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 0.68 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.56 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.63 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
RYJ vs. USMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYJ drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, which is greater than USMF's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYJ and USMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYJ | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.74% | -36.24% | -24.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -6.47% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.90% | -15.39% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.31% | -18.10% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -4.16% | -6.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.15% | +0.77% |
Volatility
RYJ vs. USMF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) at 2.22%. This indicates that RYJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYJ | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 2.22% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 7.46% | +2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 10.78% | +2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 14.26% | +4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 16.97% | +4.68% |
RYJ vs. USMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than USMF's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYJ vs. USMF - Dividend Comparison
RYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than USMF's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 1.57% | 1.75% | 1.28% | 1.39% | 0.72% | 0.52% | 0.28% | 0.20% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 0.93% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 1.31% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.74% | 1.42% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYJ and USMF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYJ has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to USMF (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYJ dropped -60.74% vs USMF's -36.24%.
On 5-year performance, USMF leads with 7.97% vs 7.34% for RYJ. On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, USMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USMF has performed better with a 7.97% return vs 7.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RYJ.
RYJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.31% for USMF.
RYJ tracks Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index, while USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RYJ and 0.28% for USMF.
RYJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYJ and USMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer