RYJ vs. SPHD
RYJ (Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RYJ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index, while SPHD is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P Low Volatility High Dividend index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RYJ returned 10.38%/yr vs 7.18%/yr for SPHD. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RYJ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.
Performance
RYJ vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYJ achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 5.32% return. Over the past 10 years, RYJ has outperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 10.38%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.18% annualized return.
RYJ
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 12.45%
- 1Y
- 18.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
SPHD
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.18%
RYJ vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 11.22% | 8.89% | 13.28% | 15.65% | -13.17% | 24.09% | 6.21% | 32.02% | -14.84% | 13.31% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 5.32% | 3.41% | 18.08% | 1.32% | 0.58% | 24.98% | -9.98% | 20.26% | -6.17% | 11.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYJ and SPHD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2012 | 0.71 |
The correlation between RYJ and SPHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
RYJ vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RYJ
SPHD
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
RYJ
SPHD
Industrials
RYJ
SPHD
Utilities
RYJ
SPHD
Consumer Cyclical
RYJ
SPHD
Technology
RYJ
SPHD
Communication Services
RYJ
SPHD
Healthcare
RYJ
SPHD
Energy
RYJ
SPHD
Basic Materials
RYJ
SPHD
-
Financial Services
RYJ
-
SPHD
Real Estate
RYJ
-
SPHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYJ vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
RYJ
SPHD
RYJ vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYJ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 0.84 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 1.30 | +0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.15 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 1.25 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 3.16 | +3.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYJ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 0.84 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.41 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.41 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.58 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
RYJ vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYJ drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, which is greater than SPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYJ and SPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYJ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.74% | -41.39% | -19.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -7.33% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.90% | -13.29% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.31% | -19.50% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.20% | -41.39% | -8.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.53% | +4.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -4.70% | -5.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.91% | +0.01% |
Volatility
RYJ vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.97%. This indicates that RYJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYJ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 2.97% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 7.54% | +2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 11.00% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 14.16% | +4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 17.64% | +4.01% |
RYJ vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYJ vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
RYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than SPHD's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 1.57% | 1.75% | 1.28% | 1.39% | 0.72% | 0.52% | 0.28% | 0.20% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 0.93% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.58% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYJ and SPHD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYJ has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to SPHD (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYJ dropped -60.74% vs SPHD's -41.39%.
On 10-year performance, RYJ leads with 10.38% vs 7.18% for SPHD. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RYJ has performed better with a 10.38% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RYJ.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.57% for RYJ.
RYJ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPHD is S&P 500. RYJ tracks Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index, while SPHD tracks S&P Low Volatility High Dividend index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RYJ and 0.30% for SPHD.
RYJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYJ and SPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer