RYJ vs. SOXQ
RYJ (Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RYJ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RYJ returned 15.52%/yr vs 58.65%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RYJ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
RYJ vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYJ achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 93.97% return.
RYJ
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 12.45%
- 1Y
- 18.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 5.90%
- 1M
- 29.63%
- YTD
- 93.97%
- 6M
- 92.43%
- 1Y
- 185.41%
- 3Y*
- 58.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RYJ vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 11.22% | 8.89% | 13.28% | 15.65% | -13.17% | 1.58% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 93.97% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYJ and SOXQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.59 |
The correlation between RYJ and SOXQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RYJ vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RYJ
SOXQ
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Defensive
RYJ
SOXQ
-
Industrials
RYJ
SOXQ
-
Utilities
RYJ
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
RYJ
SOXQ
-
Technology
RYJ
SOXQ
Communication Services
RYJ
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
RYJ
SOXQ
-
Energy
RYJ
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
RYJ
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
RYJ
-
SOXQ
Real Estate
RYJ
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYJ vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
RYJ
SOXQ
RYJ vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYJ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 5.53 | -4.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 5.28 | -3.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.73 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 12.19 | -10.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 46.84 | -40.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYJ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 5.53 | -4.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.97 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
RYJ vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYJ drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYJ and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYJ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.74% | -46.01% | -14.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -15.59% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.90% | -39.36% | +22.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -12.97% | +2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 4.06% | -1.14% |
Volatility
RYJ vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) is 4.56%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.56%. This indicates that RYJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYJ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 13.56% | -9.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 26.69% | -16.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 33.79% | -20.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 36.39% | -17.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 36.39% | -14.74% |
RYJ vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYJ vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
RYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 1.57% | 1.75% | 1.28% | 1.39% | 0.72% | 0.52% | 0.28% | 0.20% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 0.93% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYJ and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.56%) compared to RYJ (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYJ dropped -60.74% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 58.65% vs 15.52% for RYJ. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RYJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 58.65% return vs 15.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RYJ.
RYJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
RYJ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. RYJ tracks Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RYJ and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.53 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYJ and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer