RYJ vs. CTEF
RYJ (Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. RYJ is passively managed, while CTEF is actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RYJ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.
Performance
RYJ vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYJ achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 29.88% return.
RYJ
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 12.45%
- 1Y
- 18.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
CTEF
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 29.88%
- 6M
- 31.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RYJ vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 11.22% | 8.63% |
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 29.88% | 33.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYJ and CTEF is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYJ vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank
RYJ
CTEF
RYJ vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYJ | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYJ | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 3.59 | -3.25 |
Drawdowns
RYJ vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYJ drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYJ and CTEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYJ | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.74% | -15.00% | -45.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -1.80% | -8.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | — | — |
Volatility
RYJ vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYJ | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 21.84% | -8.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 21.84% | -3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 21.84% | -0.19% |
RYJ vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYJ vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison
RYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 1.57% | 1.75% | 1.28% | 1.39% | 0.72% | 0.52% | 0.28% | 0.20% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYJ and CTEF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RYJ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RYJ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.
RYJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RYJ and 0.45% for CTEF.
Find the right allocation for RYJ and CTEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer