RYGRX vs. JLGMX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RYGRX (Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund) and JLGMX (JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RYGRX returned 13.56%/yr vs 20.19%/yr for JLGMX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYGRX charges 2.26%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for JLGMX.

Performance

RYGRX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYGRX achieves a 29.30% return, which is significantly higher than JLGMX's 3.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RYGRX has underperformed JLGMX with an annualized return of 13.56%, while JLGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.19% annualized return.

RYGRX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 2.69%
• YTD: 29.30%
• 6M: 26.22%
• 1Y: 34.45%
• 3Y*: 25.15%
• 5Y*: 9.39%
• 10Y*: 13.56%

JLGMX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -2.69%
• YTD: 3.47%
• 6M: 1.62%
• 1Y: 13.69%
• 3Y*: 21.25%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: 20.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYGRX vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	29.30%	11.00%	25.73%	5.80%	-28.71%	26.61%	26.34%	34.13%	-6.28%	23.74%
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6	3.47%	14.38%	35.40%	34.95%	-25.20%	18.48%	56.39%	39.47%	0.74%	38.41%

Correlation

The correlation between RYGRX and JLGMX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2010	0.91

The correlation between RYGRX and JLGMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RYGRX vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYGRX

RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 53
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

JLGMX

JLGMX Risk / Return Rank: 12
JLGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
JLGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
JLGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
JLGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
JLGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYGRX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RYGRX	JLGMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	0.82	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	1.20	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.15	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	0.83	+2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.18	2.33	+8.84

RYGRX vs. JLGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the JLGMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYGRX and JLGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RYGRX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYGRX drawdown since its inception was -54.22%, which is greater than JLGMX's maximum drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYGRX and JLGMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYGRX	JLGMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.22%	-31.82%	-22.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.17%	-16.73%	+5.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.95%	-21.47%	-3.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.57%	-31.13%	-5.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.63%	-31.82%	-4.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.39%	-4.16%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.39%	-5.80%	-3.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	5.91%	-2.89%

Volatility

RYGRX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a higher volatility of 11.06% compared to JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) at 7.24%. This indicates that RYGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JLGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYGRX	JLGMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.06%	7.24%	+3.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.97%	12.70%	+6.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.02%	16.88%	+5.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.92%	20.40%	+3.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.06%	21.64%	+1.42%

RYGRX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYGRX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYGRX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison

RYGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than JLGMX's 10.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6	10.67%	11.04%	2.12%	0.31%	3.49%	14.25%	5.14%	12.65%	15.59%	14.44%	9.71%	4.43%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	3.94%	5.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.81%	4.43%	12.10%	7.15%	6.26%	0.05%	2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYGRX and JLGMX in my portfolio?

RYGRX and JLGMX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYGRX or JLGMX?

RYGRX has higher volatility (11.06%) compared to JLGMX (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYGRX dropped -54.22% vs JLGMX's -31.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.