PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYGRX vs. FTQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYGRX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYGRX achieves a 35.24% return, which is significantly higher than FTQGX's 32.36% return. Over the past 10 years, RYGRX has underperformed FTQGX with an annualized return of 14.07%, while FTQGX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.05% annualized return.


RYGRX

1D
1.49%
1M
10.34%
YTD
35.24%
6M
32.32%
1Y
42.19%
3Y*
27.04%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
14.07%

FTQGX

1D
0.22%
1M
9.32%
YTD
32.36%
6M
30.89%
1Y
55.95%
3Y*
31.26%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
20.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYGRX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
35.24%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
32.36%13.65%36.95%28.94%-26.68%26.91%33.41%31.44%4.90%30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between RYGRX and FTQGX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.91

The correlation between RYGRX and FTQGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYGRX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQGX
FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYGRX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYGRXFTQGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

4.51

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.75

18.97

-4.22

RYGRX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYGRX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYGRX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYGRX drawdown since its inception was -54.22%, smaller than the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYGRX and FTQGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYGRXFTQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.22%

-61.29%

+7.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-12.76%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.95%

-26.84%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.57%

-32.31%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.63%

-32.31%

-4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.39%

-14.17%

+4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.03%

-0.04%

Volatility

RYGRX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) at 8.87%. This indicates that RYGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYGRXFTQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.88%

8.87%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.39%

16.95%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

21.35%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.83%

21.95%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.05%

21.72%

+1.33%

RYGRX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYGRX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQGX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYGRX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

RYGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than FTQGX's 9.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
9.40%12.44%9.94%0.61%7.96%13.53%11.41%5.07%14.71%5.89%1.08%5.91%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
3.76%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYGRX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYGRX has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to FTQGX (8.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYGRX dropped -54.22% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYGRX and FTQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer