PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYGRX vs. CPEAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund (CPEAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYGRX achieves a 21.11% return, which is significantly higher than CPEAX's 17.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RYGRX having a 11.96% annualized return and CPEAX not far behind at 11.82%.


RYGRX

1D
2.02%
1M
-4.71%
6M
15.07%
YTD
21.11%
1Y
19.73%
3Y*
20.46%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
11.96%
ALL TIME*
9.26%

CPEAX

1D
1.06%
1M
-4.09%
6M
13.21%
YTD
17.75%
1Y
23.29%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
11.82%
ALL TIME*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
21.11%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%
CPEAX
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund
17.75%9.98%22.02%13.44%-14.87%19.59%21.00%11.14%-4.35%26.91%

Correlation

The correlation between RYGRX and CPEAX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2011

0.89

The correlation between RYGRX and CPEAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYGRX vs. CPEAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CPEAX
CPEAX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CPEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CPEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund (CPEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYGRXCPEAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.19

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.68

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

5.73

-0.47

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYGRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the CPEAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYGRX and CPEAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYGRX drawdown since its inception was -54.22%, which is greater than CPEAX's maximum drawdown of -34.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYGRX and CPEAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYGRXCPEAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.22%

-34.39%

-19.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.01%

-15.44%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.95%

-26.28%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.57%

-26.28%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.63%

-34.39%

-2.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.77%

-10.26%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-5.31%

-4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

4.53%

-0.34%

Volatility

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a higher volatility of 10.44% compared to Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund (CPEAX) at 8.53%. This indicates that RYGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYGRXCPEAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.44%

8.53%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.12%

21.99%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.91%

25.65%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

21.01%

+3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

21.06%

+2.29%

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYGRX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CPEAX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Dividend Comparison

RYGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than CPEAX's 13.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPEAX
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund
13.37%15.75%9.57%0.00%1.21%30.88%0.00%0.12%19.37%2.32%0.00%1.36%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
4.20%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, RYGRX and CPEAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RYGRX has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to CPEAX (8.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYGRX dropped -54.22% vs CPEAX's -34.39%.

CPEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYGRX and CPEAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer