RYGRX vs. CPEAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RYGRX (Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund) and CPEAX (Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RYGRX returned 14.07%/yr vs 13.68%/yr for CPEAX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYGRX charges 2.26%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for CPEAX.

Performance

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund (CPEAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYGRX achieves a 35.24% return, which is significantly higher than CPEAX's 29.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RYGRX having a 14.07% annualized return and CPEAX not far behind at 13.68%.

RYGRX

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 10.34%
• YTD: 35.24%
• 6M: 32.32%
• 1Y: 42.19%
• 3Y*: 27.04%
• 5Y*: 10.59%
• 10Y*: 14.07%

CPEAX

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: 8.99%
• YTD: 29.48%
• 6M: 26.31%
• 1Y: 43.16%
• 3Y*: 22.66%
• 5Y*: 14.50%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	35.24%	11.00%	25.73%	5.80%	-28.71%	26.61%	26.34%	34.13%	-6.28%	23.74%
CPEAX Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund	29.48%	9.98%	22.02%	13.44%	-14.87%	19.59%	21.00%	11.14%	-4.35%	26.91%

Correlation

The correlation between RYGRX and CPEAX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2011	0.89

The correlation between RYGRX and CPEAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RYGRX vs. CPEAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYGRX

RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 66
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

CPEAX

CPEAX Risk / Return Rank: 58
CPEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
CPEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
CPEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
CPEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
CPEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund (CPEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RYGRX	CPEAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.91	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	2.56	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.34	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	3.52	+0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.75	12.86	+1.89

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the CPEAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYGRX and CPEAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYGRX drawdown since its inception was -54.22%, which is greater than CPEAX's maximum drawdown of -34.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYGRX and CPEAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYGRX	CPEAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.22%	-34.39%	-19.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.17%	-12.61%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.95%	-26.28%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.57%	-26.28%	-10.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.63%	-34.39%	-2.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.39%	-5.29%	-4.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	3.44%	-0.45%

Volatility

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund (CPEAX) at 9.19%. This indicates that RYGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYGRX	CPEAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.88%	9.19%	+0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.39%	19.57%	-1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.58%	23.25%	-1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.83%	20.54%	+3.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.05%	20.80%	+2.25%

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYGRX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CPEAX's 1.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYGRX vs. CPEAX - Dividend Comparison

RYGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than CPEAX's 12.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CPEAX Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund	12.16%	15.75%	9.57%	0.00%	1.21%	30.88%	0.00%	0.12%	19.37%	2.32%	0.00%	1.36%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	3.76%	5.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.81%	4.43%	12.10%	7.15%	6.26%	0.05%	2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYGRX and CPEAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, RYGRX and CPEAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RYGRX or CPEAX?

RYGRX has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to CPEAX (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYGRX dropped -54.22% vs CPEAX's -34.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.