PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYGRX vs. CHASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYGRX vs. CHASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYGRX achieves a 29.30% return, which is significantly higher than CHASX's 24.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RYGRX has underperformed CHASX with an annualized return of 13.56%, while CHASX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.48% annualized return.


RYGRX

1D
0.15%
1M
2.69%
YTD
29.30%
6M
26.22%
1Y
34.45%
3Y*
25.15%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
13.56%

CHASX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.08%
YTD
24.18%
6M
22.01%
1Y
45.60%
3Y*
40.76%
5Y*
21.90%
10Y*
20.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYGRX vs. CHASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
29.30%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
24.18%20.61%64.71%25.91%-20.41%22.32%18.27%42.63%-3.96%24.49%

Correlation

The correlation between RYGRX and CHASX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.91

The correlation between RYGRX and CHASX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYGRX vs. CHASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CHASX
CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYGRX vs. CHASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYGRXCHASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

4.63

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

19.09

-7.91

RYGRX vs. CHASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the CHASX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYGRX and CHASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYGRX vs. CHASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYGRX drawdown since its inception was -54.22%, which is greater than CHASX's maximum drawdown of -45.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYGRX and CHASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYGRXCHASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.22%

-45.94%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-9.90%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.95%

-23.40%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.57%

-24.63%

-11.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.63%

-30.40%

-6.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.39%

-2.10%

-2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.39%

-9.14%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.40%

+0.62%

Volatility

RYGRX vs. CHASX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a higher volatility of 11.06% compared to Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) at 6.84%. This indicates that RYGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYGRXCHASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.06%

6.84%

+4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.97%

14.28%

+4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.02%

18.32%

+3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.92%

20.38%

+3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.06%

19.95%

+3.11%

RYGRX vs. CHASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYGRX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CHASX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYGRX vs. CHASX - Dividend Comparison

RYGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than CHASX's 7.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
7.35%9.12%36.67%5.80%5.49%20.15%7.83%22.82%12.92%11.92%9.14%10.24%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
3.94%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYGRX and CHASX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYGRX has higher volatility (11.06%) compared to CHASX (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYGRX dropped -54.22% vs CHASX's -45.94%.

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYGRX and CHASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer