PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYGBX vs. RYRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYGBX vs. RYRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund (RYGBX) and Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYGBX achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly lower than RYRRX's 16.29% return. Over the past 10 years, RYGBX has underperformed RYRRX with an annualized return of -4.66%, while RYRRX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.21% annualized return.


RYGBX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.19%
YTD
-1.69%
6M
-2.69%
1Y
1.46%
3Y*
-5.32%
5Y*
-10.88%
10Y*
-4.66%

RYRRX

1D
-1.33%
1M
1.83%
YTD
16.29%
6M
13.99%
1Y
37.21%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYGBX vs. RYRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYGBX
Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund
-1.69%2.19%-12.81%-1.05%-40.90%-7.28%21.93%17.50%-5.20%9.93%
RYRRX
Rydex Russell 2000 Fund
16.29%10.88%9.72%15.17%-21.70%13.23%17.81%23.57%-12.58%12.88%

Correlation

The correlation between RYGBX and RYRRX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

-0.26

The correlation between RYGBX and RYRRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYGBX vs. RYRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYGBX
RYGBX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
RYGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

RYRRX
RYRRX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RYRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RYRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYGBX vs. RYRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund (RYGBX) and Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYGBXRYRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.32

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

3.24

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.84

11.46

-10.62

RYGBX vs. RYRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYGBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the RYRRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYGBX and RYRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYGBXRYRRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

1.94

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.55

0.20

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.24

0.39

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.26

-0.19

Drawdowns

RYGBX vs. RYRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYGBX drawdown since its inception was -62.42%, roughly equal to the maximum RYRRX drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYGBX and RYRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYGBXRYRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.42%

-60.36%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.88%

-11.43%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.34%

-28.03%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.36%

-33.02%

-22.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.42%

-42.84%

-19.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.10%

-1.47%

-57.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.52%

-12.23%

-7.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

3.23%

+0.77%

Volatility

RYGBX vs. RYRRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund (RYGBX) is 3.24%, while Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that RYGBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYGBXRYRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

5.79%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.54%

13.57%

-6.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.45%

19.18%

-7.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.75%

22.57%

-2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.30%

23.45%

-4.15%

RYGBX vs. RYRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYGBX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than RYRRX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYGBX vs. RYRRX - Dividend Comparison

RYGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than RYRRX's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYGBX
Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund
3.89%3.59%2.89%2.70%1.69%0.71%46.47%5.00%1.51%1.45%5.62%2.07%
RYRRX
Rydex Russell 2000 Fund
0.56%0.65%1.02%0.19%0.00%12.84%0.00%1.46%0.00%4.82%0.00%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYGBX and RYRRX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYRRX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to RYGBX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYGBX dropped -62.42% vs RYRRX's -60.36%.

RYRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYGBX and RYRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer