RYCZX vs. RYTPX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RYCZX (Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund) and RYTPX (Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds from Rydex Funds. Over the past 10 years, RYCZX returned -26.37%/yr vs -17.73%/yr for RYTPX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYCZX charges 2.70%/yr vs 2.16%/yr for RYTPX.

Performance

RYCZX vs. RYTPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund (RYCZX) and Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RYCZX having a -14.24% return and RYTPX slightly lower at -14.86%. Over the past 10 years, RYCZX has underperformed RYTPX with an annualized return of -26.37%, while RYTPX has yielded a comparatively higher -17.73% annualized return.

RYCZX

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -4.58%
• YTD: -14.24%
• 6M: -12.72%
• 1Y: -31.28%
• 3Y*: -22.84%
• 5Y*: -17.19%
• 10Y*: -26.37%

RYTPX

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 1.34%
• YTD: -14.86%
• 6M: -13.13%
• 1Y: -31.92%
• 3Y*: -27.68%
• 5Y*: -21.83%
• 10Y*: -17.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYCZX vs. RYTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYCZX Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund	-14.24%	-22.14%	-16.97%	-19.05%	5.48%	-36.32%	-45.37%	-36.65%	0.75%	-39.59%
RYTPX Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund	-14.86%	-27.24%	-29.24%	-31.96%	29.31%	-43.38%	-50.05%	-41.84%	4.42%	-32.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCZX and RYTPX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005	0.89

The correlation between RYCZX and RYTPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RYCZX vs. RYTPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYCZX

RYCZX Risk / Return Rank: 0
RYCZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
RYCZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
RYCZX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
RYCZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
RYCZX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

RYTPX

RYTPX Risk / Return Rank: 0
RYTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
RYTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
RYTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
RYTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
RYTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYCZX vs. RYTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund (RYCZX) and Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RYCZX	RYTPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.31	-1.34	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.91	-2.06	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	0.78	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.01	-0.98	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.71	-1.66	-0.05

RYCZX vs. RYTPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCZX Sharpe Ratio is -1.31, which is comparable to the RYTPX Sharpe Ratio of -1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCZX and RYTPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RYCZX vs. RYTPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCZX drawdown since its inception was -99.79%, roughly equal to the maximum RYTPX drawdown of -99.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCZX and RYTPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYCZX	RYTPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.79%	-99.92%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.84%	-32.67%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.09%	-68.03%	+8.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.41%	-75.66%	+8.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.51%	-96.56%	+1.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.79%	-99.92%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-78.89%	-82.33%	+3.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.38%	21.45%	-1.07%

Volatility

RYCZX vs. RYTPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund (RYCZX) is 8.48%, while Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that RYCZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYCZX	RYTPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.48%	9.17%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.71%	19.67%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.94%	24.97%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.67%	33.93%	-4.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.29%	290.10%	-254.81%

RYCZX vs. RYTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYCZX has a 2.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RYTPX's 2.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYCZX vs. RYTPX - Dividend Comparison

RYCZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, more than RYTPX's 6.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RYCZX Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund	6.86%	5.88%	4.32%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	0.24%
RYTPX Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund	6.04%	5.15%	6.90%	3.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYCZX and RYTPX in my portfolio?

RYCZX and RYTPX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYCZX or RYTPX?

RYTPX has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to RYCZX (8.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCZX dropped -99.79% vs RYTPX's -99.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYCZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.31 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.