RYCKX vs. RYTPX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RYCKX (Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund) and RYTPX (Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - RYCKX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Rydex Funds, while RYTPX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by Rydex Funds. Over the past 10 years, RYCKX returned 8.69%/yr vs -17.50%/yr for RYTPX. At a correlation of -0.83, they often move in opposite directions. RYCKX charges 2.26%/yr vs 2.16%/yr for RYTPX.

Performance

RYCKX vs. RYTPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) and Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCKX achieves a 19.43% return, which is significantly higher than RYTPX's -12.39% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCKX has outperformed RYTPX with an annualized return of 8.69%, while RYTPX has yielded a comparatively lower -17.50% annualized return.

RYCKX

• 1D: -2.08%
• 1M: 2.47%
• YTD: 19.43%
• 6M: 16.69%
• 1Y: 28.80%
• 3Y*: 17.02%
• 5Y*: 5.39%
• 10Y*: 8.69%

RYTPX

• 1D: 2.90%
• 1M: 4.28%
• YTD: -12.39%
• 6M: -10.07%
• 1Y: -28.37%
• 3Y*: -26.98%
• 5Y*: -21.19%
• 10Y*: -17.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYCKX vs. RYTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYCKX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund	19.43%	6.61%	15.10%	13.97%	-23.05%	11.26%	29.72%	14.60%	-15.17%	18.02%
RYTPX Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund	-12.39%	-27.24%	-29.24%	-31.96%	29.31%	-43.38%	-50.05%	-41.84%	4.42%	-32.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCKX and RYTPX is -0.77, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005	-0.83

The correlation between RYCKX and RYTPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.83 to -0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RYCKX vs. RYTPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYCKX

RYCKX Risk / Return Rank: 48
RYCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
RYCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
RYCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
RYCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
RYCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

RYTPX

RYTPX Risk / Return Rank: 0
RYTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
RYTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
RYTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
RYTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
RYTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYCKX vs. RYTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) and Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RYCKX	RYTPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	-1.20	+2.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	-1.80	+4.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	0.80	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	-0.92	+3.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.60	-1.62	+13.22

RYCKX vs. RYTPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the RYTPX Sharpe Ratio of -1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCKX and RYTPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RYCKX vs. RYTPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCKX drawdown since its inception was -52.60%, smaller than the maximum RYTPX drawdown of -99.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCKX and RYTPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYCKX	RYTPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.60%	-99.92%	+47.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.50%	-32.67%	+22.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.14%	-68.03%	+40.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.98%	-75.66%	+39.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.75%	-96.56%	+51.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.08%	-99.91%	+97.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.49%	-82.33%	+72.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	20.16%	-17.54%

Volatility

RYCKX vs. RYTPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) is 6.76%, while Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX) has a volatility of 9.58%. This indicates that RYCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYCKX	RYTPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.76%	9.58%	-2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.55%	19.85%	-4.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.13%	25.10%	-5.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.89%	33.95%	-11.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.09%	290.09%	-267.00%

RYCKX vs. RYTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYCKX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than RYTPX's 2.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYCKX vs. RYTPX - Dividend Comparison

RYCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RYCKX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	20.92%	0.00%	14.34%	13.66%	1.29%	0.00%	18.93%	7.60%	1.72%	5.90%
RYTPX Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund	5.87%	5.15%	6.90%	3.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYCKX and RYTPX in my portfolio?

RYCKX and RYTPX have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYCKX or RYTPX?

RYTPX has higher volatility (9.58%) compared to RYCKX (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCKX dropped -52.60% vs RYTPX's -99.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.