PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYCKX vs. RYRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYCKX vs. RYRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) and Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCKX achieves a 21.00% return, which is significantly higher than RYRRX's 19.73% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCKX has underperformed RYRRX with an annualized return of 8.52%, while RYRRX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.59% annualized return.


RYCKX

1D
1.09%
1M
3.82%
YTD
21.00%
6M
18.07%
1Y
31.61%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
6.44%
10Y*
8.52%

RYRRX

1D
2.04%
1M
3.82%
YTD
19.73%
6M
16.16%
1Y
40.55%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
9.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYCKX vs. RYRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
21.00%6.61%15.10%13.97%-23.05%11.26%29.72%14.60%-15.17%18.02%
RYRRX
Rydex Russell 2000 Fund
19.73%10.88%9.72%15.17%-21.70%13.23%17.81%23.57%-12.58%12.88%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCKX and RYRRX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007

0.92

The correlation between RYCKX and RYRRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYCKX vs. RYRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYCKX
RYCKX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RYCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

RYRRX
RYRRX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
RYRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RYRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYCKX vs. RYRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) and Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYCKXRYRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.34

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.54

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.17

12.48

-0.30

RYCKX vs. RYRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the RYRRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCKX and RYRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYCKX vs. RYRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCKX drawdown since its inception was -52.60%, smaller than the maximum RYRRX drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCKX and RYRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYCKXRYRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.60%

-60.36%

+7.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.50%

-11.43%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

-28.03%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.98%

-33.02%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.75%

-42.84%

-1.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

0.00%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-12.20%

+2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

3.24%

-0.62%

Volatility

RYCKX vs. RYRRX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) and Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX) have volatilities of 6.58% and 6.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYCKXRYRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

6.77%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

14.34%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.00%

19.68%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.88%

22.66%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

23.50%

-0.39%

RYCKX vs. RYRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYCKX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than RYRRX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYCKX vs. RYRRX - Dividend Comparison

RYCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%20.92%0.00%14.34%13.66%1.29%0.00%18.93%7.60%1.72%5.90%
RYRRX
Rydex Russell 2000 Fund
0.54%0.65%1.02%0.19%0.00%12.84%0.00%1.46%0.00%4.82%0.00%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYCKX and RYRRX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYRRX has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to RYCKX (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCKX dropped -52.60% vs RYRRX's -60.36%.

RYRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYCKX and RYRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer