PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYCKX vs. RYPMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYCKX vs. RYPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) and Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCKX achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly higher than RYPMX's 7.46% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCKX has underperformed RYPMX with an annualized return of 8.17%, while RYPMX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.77% annualized return.


RYCKX

1D
0.61%
1M
6.36%
YTD
20.27%
6M
19.77%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
8.17%

RYPMX

1D
1.28%
1M
5.36%
YTD
7.46%
6M
14.86%
1Y
80.72%
3Y*
43.06%
5Y*
17.92%
10Y*
14.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYCKX vs. RYPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
20.27%6.61%15.10%13.97%-23.05%11.26%29.72%14.60%-15.17%18.02%
RYPMX
Rydex Precious Metals Fund
7.46%148.94%10.14%4.24%-10.57%-8.96%34.25%52.91%-16.56%7.04%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCKX and RYPMX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.32

The correlation between RYCKX and RYPMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (10 years) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYCKX vs. RYPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYCKX
RYCKX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
RYCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

RYPMX
RYPMX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
RYPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RYPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYCKX vs. RYPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) and Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYCKXRYPMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.61

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

6.87

+4.99

RYCKX vs. RYPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the RYPMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCKX and RYPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYCKXRYPMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.77

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.49

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.40

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.08

+0.27

Drawdowns

RYCKX vs. RYPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCKX drawdown since its inception was -52.60%, smaller than the maximum RYPMX drawdown of -81.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCKX and RYPMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYCKXRYPMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.60%

-81.25%

+28.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.50%

-30.86%

+20.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

-30.86%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.98%

-46.46%

+10.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.75%

-47.81%

+3.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-22.11%

+22.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-40.37%

+30.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

11.71%

-9.11%

Volatility

RYCKX vs. RYPMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) is 6.42%, while Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX) has a volatility of 15.04%. This indicates that RYCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYCKXRYPMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.42%

15.04%

-8.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.65%

37.48%

-22.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.34%

45.86%

-27.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.78%

36.93%

-14.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.06%

37.03%

-13.97%

RYCKX vs. RYPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYCKX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than RYPMX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYCKX vs. RYPMX - Dividend Comparison

RYCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%20.92%0.00%14.34%13.66%1.29%0.00%18.93%7.60%1.72%5.90%
RYPMX
Rydex Precious Metals Fund
2.80%3.01%0.00%3.51%7.15%6.39%1.06%2.08%1.35%5.53%4.04%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYCKX and RYPMX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYPMX has higher volatility (15.04%) compared to RYCKX (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCKX dropped -52.60% vs RYPMX's -81.25%.

RYPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYCKX and RYPMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer