RYCEY vs. SGOV
RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) is a stock, while SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Over the past 5 years, RYCEY returned 71.41%/yr vs 3.66%/yr for SGOV. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RYCEY vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 25.54% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 2.11% return.
RYCEY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- YTD
- 25.54%
- 1Y
- 38.67%
- 3Y*
- 104.37%
- 5Y*
- 71.41%
- 10Y*
- 7.73%
- ALL TIME*
- -10.85%
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $76.52M | $69.38M | $55.87M | |
| $1.83B | $1.81B | $2.03B |
RYCEY vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 25.54% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -61.65% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 2.11% | 4.24% | 5.27% | 5.12% | 1.58% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYCEY and SGOV is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020 | 0.05 |
The correlation between RYCEY and SGOV shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYCEY vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank
RYCEY
SGOV
RYCEY vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RYCEY | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -19.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -380.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 382.06 | -380.85 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 389.90 | -388.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.12 | 6,177.21 | -6,172.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RYCEY vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and SGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYCEY | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.07% | -0.03% | -99.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.75% | -0.01% | -21.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.37% | -0.01% | -23.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.01% | -0.03% | -61.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.08% | 0.00% | -75.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.06% | 0.00% | -84.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | 0.00% | +7.92% |
Volatility
RYCEY vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that RYCEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYCEY | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.43% | 0.05% | +11.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.98% | 0.13% | +33.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.07% | 0.19% | +38.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.26% | 0.24% | +43.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.12% | 0.23% | +48.89% |
Dividends
RYCEY vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison
RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than SGOV's 3.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.65% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.43% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYCEY and SGOV have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYCEY has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs SGOV's -0.03%.
SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.78 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYCEY and SGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer