RYCEY vs. LUNR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) and LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 3 years, RYCEY returned 113.04%/yr vs 42.24%/yr for LUNR. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RYCEY vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.02% return.

RYCEY

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: 7.56%
• YTD: 12.43%
• 6M: 19.66%
• 1Y: 46.06%
• 3Y*: 113.04%
• 5Y*: 61.46%
• 10Y*: 8.49%

LUNR

• 1D: -13.12%
• 1M: -25.39%
• YTD: 64.02%
• 6M: 122.39%
• 1Y: 144.44%
• 3Y*: 42.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYCEY vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc	12.43%	123.64%	88.21%	253.27%	-33.95%	-14.29%
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc.	64.02%	-10.63%	610.76%	-74.45%	3.73%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCEY and LUNR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021	0.15

The correlation between RYCEY and LUNR shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap RYCEY : $147.86B LUNR : $3.94T
EPS RYCEY : £0.99 LUNR : -$0.00
PS Ratio RYCEY : 2.77 LUNR : 2.95K
Total Revenue (TTM) RYCEY : £40.04B LUNR : $334.27M
Gross Profit (TTM) RYCEY : £10.10B LUNR : $85.92M
EBITDA (TTM) RYCEY : £8.04B LUNR : -$96.76M

Return for Risk

RYCEY vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYCEY

RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 77
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 73
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 80

LUNR

LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 81
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYCEY vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RYCEY	LUNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.31	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	2.24	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.26	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	3.47	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.98	7.12	-1.15

RYCEY vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCEY and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RYCEY vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, roughly equal to the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and LUNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYCEY	LUNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.07%	-97.43%	-1.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.75%	-41.94%	+20.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.37%	-78.54%	+55.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.68%	-67.53%	-10.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.15%	-63.21%	-20.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.73%	20.37%	-12.64%

Volatility

RYCEY vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) is 12.00%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.95%. This indicates that RYCEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYCEY	LUNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.00%	42.95%	-30.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.70%	93.42%	-60.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.88%	111.16%	-73.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.48%	171.29%	-127.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.35%	171.29%	-121.94%

Dividends

RYCEY vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while LUNR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc	0.72%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.51%	1.56%	1.32%	1.55%	4.19%	14.44%

Financials

RYCEY vs. LUNR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and Intuitive Machines Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

LUNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a gross profit of 72.82M and revenue of 186.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

LUNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported an operating income of -39.20M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

LUNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a net income of -37.55M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in a net margin of -20.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYCEY and LUNR in my portfolio?

RYCEY and LUNR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYCEY or LUNR?

LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to RYCEY (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs LUNR's -97.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.