PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYCEY vs. FCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RYCEY vs. FCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than FCX's 35.32% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY has underperformed FCX with an annualized return of 8.49%, while FCX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.12% annualized return.


RYCEY

1D
1.79%
1M
7.56%
YTD
12.43%
6M
19.66%
1Y
46.06%
3Y*
113.04%
5Y*
61.46%
10Y*
8.49%

FCX

1D
3.12%
1M
1.86%
YTD
35.32%
6M
45.06%
1Y
68.06%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
22.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYCEY vs. FCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
12.43%123.64%88.21%253.27%-33.95%2.53%-82.05%-12.69%-7.35%40.70%
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
35.32%35.41%-9.41%13.69%-7.91%61.41%99.06%29.59%-45.11%43.75%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCEY and FCX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014

0.33

The correlation between RYCEY and FCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RYCEY:

$147.86B

FCX:

$98.78B

EPS

RYCEY:

£0.99

FCX:

$1.89

PE Ratio

RYCEY:

13.26

FCX:

36.13

PS Ratio

RYCEY:

2.77

FCX:

3.74

PB Ratio

RYCEY:

40.55

FCX:

5.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

RYCEY:

£40.04B

FCX:

$26.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RYCEY:

£10.10B

FCX:

$7.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

RYCEY:

£8.04B

FCX:

$9.59B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYCEY vs. FCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FCX
FCX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYCEY vs. FCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYCEYFCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.75

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.98

6.85

-0.87

RYCEY vs. FCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the FCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCEY and FCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYCEY vs. FCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than FCX's maximum drawdown of -92.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and FCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYCEYFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-92.52%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.75%

-24.90%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-46.34%

+22.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.01%

-51.47%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.64%

-72.59%

-22.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.68%

-4.62%

-73.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.15%

-39.62%

-44.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

9.97%

-2.24%

Volatility

RYCEY vs. FCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) is 12.00%, while Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) has a volatility of 17.98%. This indicates that RYCEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYCEYFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.00%

17.98%

-5.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.70%

37.53%

-4.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.88%

48.88%

-11.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.48%

45.14%

-1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.35%

48.65%

+0.70%

Dividends

RYCEY vs. FCX - Dividend Comparison

RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than FCX's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
0.88%1.18%1.58%1.41%0.99%0.54%0.19%1.52%1.45%0.00%0.00%8.46%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.72%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%

Financials

RYCEY vs. FCX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B202120222023202420252026
11.64B
6.23B
(RYCEY) Total Revenue
(FCX) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RYCEY values in GBP, FCX values in USD

RYCEY vs. FCX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%202120222023202420252026
27.4%
26.6%
Portfolio components
RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

FCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

FCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reported an operating income of 2.14B and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

FCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reported a net income of 881.00M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RYCEY and FCX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCX has higher volatility (17.98%) compared to RYCEY (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs FCX's -92.52%.

FCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYCEY and FCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer