RXT vs. XOM
RXT (Rackspace Technology, Inc.) and XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) are both stocks. RXT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while XOM operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 5 years, RXT returned -24.22%/yr vs 24.43%/yr for XOM. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RXT vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXT achieves a 436.62% return, which is significantly higher than XOM's 28.46% return.
RXT
- 1D
- -4.40%
- 1M
- 159.20%
- YTD
- 436.62%
- 6M
- 405.83%
- 1Y
- 405.83%
- 3Y*
- 43.58%
- 5Y*
- -24.22%
- 10Y*
- —
XOM
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 28.46%
- 6M
- 31.23%
- 1Y
- 51.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- 24.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.29%
RXT vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXT Rackspace Technology, Inc. | 436.62% | -56.07% | 10.50% | -32.20% | -78.10% | -29.33% | 16.29% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 28.46% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -1.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXT and XOM is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.09 |
The correlation between RXT and XOM shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RXT:
$1.30B
XOM:
$638.03B
RXT:
-$0.60
XOM:
$5.93
RXT:
0.47
XOM:
2.00
RXT:
$2.70B
XOM:
$326.01B
RXT:
$498.60M
XOM:
$83.11B
RXT:
$149.50M
XOM:
$60.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXT vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
RXT
XOM
RXT vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rackspace Technology, Inc. (RXT) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RXT | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 2.12 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.34 | 2.69 | +2.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.34 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.27 | 3.31 | +1.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.92 | 9.46 | +2.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RXT | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.12 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.92 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.48 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
RXT vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXT drawdown since its inception was -98.43%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXT and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXT | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.43% | -62.40% | -36.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.65% | -15.69% | -61.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.50% | -18.92% | -67.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.08% | -20.51% | -77.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.02% | -10.44% | -69.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.95% | -10.20% | -61.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.25% | 5.48% | +28.77% |
Volatility
RXT vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
Rackspace Technology, Inc. (RXT) has a higher volatility of 89.50% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 10.10%. This indicates that RXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXT | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 89.50% | 10.10% | +79.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 178.10% | 20.33% | +157.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 279.73% | 24.49% | +255.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.72% | 26.73% | +119.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 137.57% | 28.18% | +109.39% |
Dividends
RXT vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
RXT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXT Rackspace Technology, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.67% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
RXT vs. XOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rackspace Technology, Inc. and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RXT vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison
RXT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rackspace Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 119.10M and revenue of 678.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.6%.
XOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
RXT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rackspace Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of -17.80M and revenue of 678.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.6%.
XOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
RXT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rackspace Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 8.30M and revenue of 678.10M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
XOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RXT and XOM have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RXT has higher volatility (89.50%) compared to XOM (10.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXT dropped -98.43% vs XOM's -62.40%.
XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RXT and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer