RXT vs. UBER
RXT (Rackspace Technology, Inc.) and UBER (Uber Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — RXT in Software - Infrastructure, UBER in Software - Application. Over the past 5 years, RXT returned -23.44%/yr vs 8.02%/yr for UBER. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RXT vs. UBER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXT achieves a 461.33% return, which is significantly higher than UBER's -12.35% return.
RXT
- 1D
- -7.94%
- 1M
- 207.91%
- YTD
- 461.33%
- 6M
- 448.40%
- 1Y
- 429.13%
- 3Y*
- 45.76%
- 5Y*
- -23.44%
- 10Y*
- —
UBER
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -12.35%
- 6M
- -18.21%
- 1Y
- -14.37%
- 3Y*
- 21.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- —
RXT vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXT Rackspace Technology, Inc. | 461.33% | -56.07% | 10.50% | -32.20% | -78.10% | -29.33% | 16.29% |
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | -12.35% | 35.46% | -2.03% | 148.97% | -41.02% | -17.78% | 53.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXT and UBER is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.28 |
The correlation between RXT and UBER shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RXT:
$1.36B
UBER:
$148.35B
RXT:
-$0.60
UBER:
$4.05
RXT:
0.49
UBER:
2.81
RXT:
$2.70B
UBER:
$53.69B
RXT:
$498.60M
UBER:
$22.03B
RXT:
$149.50M
UBER:
$5.85B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXT vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank
RXT
UBER
RXT vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rackspace Technology, Inc. (RXT) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RXT | UBER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | -0.44 | +1.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.41 | -0.45 | +5.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 0.95 | +0.63 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | -0.48 | +5.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.05 | -0.87 | +11.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RXT | UBER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | -0.44 | +1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.18 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.16 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
RXT vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXT drawdown since its inception was -98.43%, which is greater than UBER's maximum drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXT and UBER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXT | UBER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.43% | -68.05% | -30.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.65% | -30.89% | -46.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.50% | -30.89% | -55.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.08% | -60.45% | -37.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.09% | -28.45% | -50.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.94% | -25.66% | -46.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.20% | 17.13% | +17.07% |
Volatility
RXT vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison
Rackspace Technology, Inc. (RXT) has a higher volatility of 89.33% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) at 11.98%. This indicates that RXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXT | UBER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 89.33% | 11.98% | +77.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 178.08% | 24.24% | +153.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 279.89% | 32.60% | +247.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.71% | 44.88% | +101.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 137.61% | 50.72% | +86.89% |
Dividends
RXT vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison
Neither RXT nor UBER has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RXT vs. UBER - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rackspace Technology, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RXT vs. UBER - Profitability Comparison
RXT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rackspace Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 119.10M and revenue of 678.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.6%.
UBER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.
RXT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rackspace Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of -17.80M and revenue of 678.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.6%.
UBER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.
RXT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rackspace Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 8.30M and revenue of 678.10M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
UBER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RXT and UBER have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RXT has higher volatility (89.33%) compared to UBER (11.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXT dropped -98.43% vs UBER's -68.05%.
RXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RXT and UBER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer