PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RXL vs. SOXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RXL vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXL achieves a -5.87% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 525.03% return. Over the past 10 years, RXL has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of 11.97%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 64.43% annualized return.


RXL

1D
6.28%
1M
8.64%
YTD
-5.87%
6M
-4.29%
1Y
24.14%
3Y*
5.25%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
11.97%

SOXL

1D
-6.36%
1M
82.23%
YTD
525.03%
6M
481.71%
1Y
1,280.87%
3Y*
133.82%
5Y*
46.78%
10Y*
64.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RXL vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RXL
ProShares Ultra Health Care
-5.87%19.76%-2.72%-3.15%-15.26%48.06%19.24%40.40%3.38%46.92%
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
525.03%54.91%-12.31%226.98%-85.66%118.84%70.04%231.83%-39.07%141.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RXL and SOXL is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2010

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between RXL and SOXL has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RXL vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RXL
SOXL

Healthcare

78.5%

-

Financial Services

12.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

RXL
78.5%
SOXL

-

Financial Services

RXL
12.0%
SOXL

-

Basic Materials

RXL

-

SOXL

-

Communication Services

RXL

-

SOXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

RXL

-

SOXL

-

Consumer Defensive

RXL

-

SOXL

-

Energy

RXL

-

SOXL

-

Industrials

RXL

-

SOXL

-

Real Estate

RXL

-

SOXL

-

Technology

RXL

-

SOXL
100.0%

Utilities

RXL

-

SOXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RXL vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RXL
RXL Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RXL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
RXL Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXL
SOXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SOXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RXL vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RXLSOXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-11.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.69

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

29.80

-28.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.68

102.14

-99.46

RXL vs. SOXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXL Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the SOXL Sharpe Ratio of 12.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXL and SOXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RXLSOXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

12.69

-11.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.44

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.65

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.51

-0.10

Drawdowns

RXL vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXL drawdown since its inception was -67.70%, smaller than the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXL and SOXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RXLSOXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.70%

-90.46%

+22.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.33%

-43.47%

+22.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.08%

-87.88%

+51.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.08%

-90.46%

+54.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.00%

-90.46%

+39.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.45%

-6.36%

-8.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.86%

-35.01%

+19.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.05%

12.66%

-3.61%

Volatility

RXL vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) is 10.34%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 41.05%. This indicates that RXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RXLSOXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.34%

41.05%

-30.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.51%

81.57%

-60.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.16%

102.16%

-72.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.73%

107.25%

-77.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.28%

99.05%

-65.77%

RXL vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RXL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RXL vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison

RXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RXL
ProShares Ultra Health Care
1.54%1.43%1.22%0.18%0.32%0.10%0.15%0.27%0.32%0.11%0.12%0.93%
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
0.03%0.34%1.18%0.51%1.07%0.04%0.05%0.38%1.30%0.09%4.84%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RXL and SOXL have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXL has higher volatility (41.05%) compared to RXL (10.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXL dropped -67.70% vs SOXL's -90.46%.

On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 64.43% vs 11.97% for RXL. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RXL has been the lower-risk option at 10.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 64.43% return vs 11.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RXL.

RXL has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.

RXL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RXL and 0.75% for SOXL.

SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.69 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RXL and SOXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer