RXL vs. PLUL
RXL (ProShares Ultra Health Care) and PLUL (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - RXL tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%) while PLUL tracks the Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. RXL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PLUL.
Performance
RXL vs. PLUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RXL
- 1D
- -3.96%
- 1M
- 6.19%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 31.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
PLUL
- 1D
- 9.07%
- 1M
- -34.75%
- 6M
- -37.88%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RXL vs. PLUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care | -1.17% |
PLUL Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF | -37.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXL and PLUL is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXL vs. PLUL — Risk / Return Rank
RXL
PLUL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RXL vs. PLUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF (PLUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RXL | PLUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.35 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RXL vs. PLUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXL drawdown since its inception was -67.70%, smaller than the maximum PLUL drawdown of -74.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXL and PLUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXL | PLUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.70% | -74.73% | +7.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.41% | -72.43% | +65.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -31.40% | +15.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.31% | — | — |
Volatility
RXL vs. PLUL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXL | PLUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.92% | 179.76% | -147.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.14% | 179.76% | -149.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.38% | 179.76% | -146.38% |
RXL vs. PLUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RXL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PLUL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RXL vs. PLUL - Dividend Comparison
RXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, while PLUL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLUL Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care | 1.35% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 0.18% | 0.32% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.27% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RXL and PLUL have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLUL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLUL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RXL.
RXL has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.00% for PLUL.
RXL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%), while PLUL tracks Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RXL and 0.75% for PLUL.
Find the right allocation for RXL and PLUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer