RXI vs. IGM
RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) and IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RXI is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RXI returned 9.97%/yr vs 24.86%/yr for IGM. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGM.
Performance
RXI vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXI achieves a -6.75% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 22.65% return. Over the past 10 years, RXI has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 9.97%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 24.86% annualized return.
RXI
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- -6.75%
- 6M
- -8.04%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
IGM
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 22.65%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 47.83%
- 3Y*
- 35.67%
- 5Y*
- 19.25%
- 10Y*
- 24.86%
RXI vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | -6.75% | 13.16% | 17.26% | 27.57% | -29.08% | 16.32% | 24.46% | 26.78% | -6.30% | 22.94% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 22.65% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXI and IGM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2006 | 0.76 |
The correlation between RXI and IGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.76 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RXI vs. IGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RXI
IGM
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
RXI
IGM
Technology
RXI
IGM
Consumer Defensive
RXI
IGM
-
Industrials
RXI
IGM
Communication Services
RXI
IGM
Basic Materials
RXI
-
IGM
Energy
RXI
-
IGM
Financial Services
RXI
-
IGM
Healthcare
RXI
-
IGM
-
Real Estate
RXI
-
IGM
-
Utilities
RXI
-
IGM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXI vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
RXI
IGM
RXI vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RXI | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.36 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 2.92 | -2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | 9.77 | -8.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RXI vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXI drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXI and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXI | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.36% | -65.59% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -16.44% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.64% | -26.39% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.78% | -40.68% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.78% | -40.68% | +4.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.37% | -7.39% | -2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.53% | -15.21% | +4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.34% | 4.91% | +0.43% |
Volatility
RXI vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) is 5.67%, while iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a volatility of 11.53%. This indicates that RXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXI | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 11.53% | -5.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.08% | 18.67% | -5.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.71% | 22.76% | -6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 26.07% | -5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 24.71% | -4.62% |
RXI vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IGM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
RXI vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
RXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than IGM's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.49% | 1.55% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 0.89% | 0.65% | 1.48% | 1.73% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RXI and IGM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to RXI (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXI dropped -60.36% vs IGM's -65.59%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 24.86% vs 9.97% for RXI. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 24.86% return vs 9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for RXI.
RXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.14% for IGM.
RXI is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while IGM is Technology Equities. RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for RXI and 0.39% for IGM.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RXI and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer