RXI vs. DRLL
RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RXI is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RXI returned 10.40%/yr vs 11.02%/yr for DRLL. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.
Performance
RXI vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXI achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 29.95% return.
RXI
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 3.87%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.67%
DRLL
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- YTD
- 29.95%
- 1Y
- 37.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $478.10K | $507.89K | $528.94K | |
| $4.47M | $2.92M | $2.10M |
RXI vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | -0.08% | 13.16% | 17.26% | 27.57% | -11.14% |
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 29.95% | 7.74% | 0.02% | -1.84% | 15.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXI and DRLL is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | 0.20 |
The correlation between RXI and DRLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RXI vs. DRLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RXI
DRLL
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
RXI
DRLL
Technology
RXI
DRLL
-
Consumer Defensive
RXI
DRLL
-
Communication Services
RXI
DRLL
-
Industrials
RXI
DRLL
-
Basic Materials
RXI
-
DRLL
-
Energy
RXI
-
DRLL
Financial Services
RXI
-
DRLL
-
Healthcare
RXI
-
DRLL
-
Real Estate
RXI
-
DRLL
-
Utilities
RXI
-
DRLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXI vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank
RXI
DRLL
RXI vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RXI | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.27 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 2.20 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 5.57 | -3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RXI vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXI drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, which is greater than DRLL's maximum drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXI and DRLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXI | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.36% | -23.73% | -36.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -16.99% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.64% | -23.73% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -9.02% | +5.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.52% | -8.14% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | 6.71% | -0.70% |
Volatility
RXI vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) is 5.45%, while Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that RXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXI | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 7.42% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 18.67% | -5.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.97% | 23.14% | -6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 23.82% | -2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 23.82% | -3.72% |
RXI vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
RXI vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison
RXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than DRLL's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 2.34% | 2.99% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.39% | 1.55% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 0.89% | 0.65% | 1.48% | 1.73% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RXI and DRLL have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRLL has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to RXI (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXI dropped -60.36% vs DRLL's -23.73%.
On 3-year performance, DRLL leads with 11.02% vs 10.40% for RXI. On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, RXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 11.02% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for RXI.
DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.39% for RXI.
RXI is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while DRLL is Energy Equities. RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while DRLL tracks Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for RXI and 0.41% for DRLL.
DRLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RXI and DRLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer