RXI vs. BEDZ

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) and BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. RXI is passively managed, while BEDZ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RXI returned 4.73%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for BEDZ. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BEDZ.

Performance

RXI vs. BEDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXI achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than BEDZ's 13.02% return.

RXI

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 4.24%
• 6M: -0.61%
• YTD: -0.35%
• 1Y: 9.67%
• 3Y*: 10.30%
• 5Y*: 4.73%
• 10Y*: 9.86%
• ALL TIME*: 8.65%

BEDZ

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.56%
• 6M: 15.78%
• YTD: 13.02%
• 1Y: 18.47%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	$46.98K	$49.99K	$78.79K
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF	$4.84M	$2.90M	$2.10M

RXI vs. BEDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF	-0.35%	13.16%	17.26%	27.57%	-29.08%	7.64%
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	13.02%	3.46%	18.31%	23.88%	-13.40%	7.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RXI and BEDZ is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.71

The correlation between RXI and BEDZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

RXI vs. BEDZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RXI	BEDZ
Consumer Cyclical	94.9%	44.5%
Technology	4.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	-
Communication Services	0.2%	1.5%
Industrials	0.1%	4.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	50.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RXI vs. BEDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RXI

RXI Risk / Return Rank: 22
RXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
RXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
RXI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
RXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
RXI Martin Ratio Rank: 21

BEDZ

BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 34
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 32
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RXI vs. BEDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RXI	BEDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	0.92	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	1.47	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.17	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	1.54	-0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.61	3.65	-2.04

RXI vs. BEDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the BEDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXI and BEDZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RXI vs. BEDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXI drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, which is greater than BEDZ's maximum drawdown of -29.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXI and BEDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RXI	BEDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.36%	-29.70%	-30.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.17%	-12.06%	-3.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.64%	-28.31%	+8.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.78%	-29.70%	-6.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.22%	-1.45%	-2.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.52%	-7.88%	-2.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.01%	5.07%	+0.94%

Volatility

RXI vs. BEDZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) have volatilities of 5.46% and 5.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RXI	BEDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.46%	5.32%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.67%	15.02%	-1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.00%	20.25%	-3.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.08%	24.59%	-3.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.11%	24.64%	-4.53%

RXI vs. BEDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than BEDZ's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

RXI vs. BEDZ - Dividend Comparison

RXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than BEDZ's 2.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	2.04%	2.31%	0.00%	1.67%	0.21%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.40%	1.55%	1.07%	1.00%	1.00%	0.89%	0.65%	1.48%	1.73%	1.26%	1.77%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RXI and BEDZ in my portfolio?

RXI and BEDZ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RXI or BEDZ?

RXI has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to BEDZ (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXI dropped -60.36% vs BEDZ's -29.70%.

Which ETF is better, RXI or BEDZ?

On 5-year performance, BEDZ leads with 11.07% vs 4.73% for RXI. On fees, RXI is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, BEDZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RXI or BEDZ?

Over the 5-year period, BEDZ has performed better with a 11.07% return vs 4.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RXI or BEDZ?

RXI is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RXI or BEDZ?

BEDZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.40% for RXI.

What is the main difference between RXI and BEDZ?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for RXI and 0.99% for BEDZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BEDZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.