RXI vs. AWAY
RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) and AWAY (ETFMG Travel Tech ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - RXI tracks the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index while AWAY tracks the Prime Travel Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RXI returned 4.22%/yr vs -11.20%/yr for AWAY. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AWAY.
Performance
RXI vs. AWAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXI achieves a -3.90% return, which is significantly higher than AWAY's -16.40% return.
RXI
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- -3.90%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 5.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
AWAY
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -16.40%
- 6M
- -17.29%
- 1Y
- -18.42%
- 3Y*
- 0.30%
- 5Y*
- -11.20%
- 10Y*
- —
RXI vs. AWAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | -3.90% | 13.16% | 17.26% | 27.57% | -29.08% | 16.32% | 22.50% |
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | -16.40% | -3.36% | 10.44% | 17.94% | -32.25% | -5.91% | 4.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXI and AWAY is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2020 | 0.76 |
The correlation between RXI and AWAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
RXI vs. AWAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RXI
AWAY
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
RXI
AWAY
Technology
RXI
AWAY
Consumer Defensive
RXI
AWAY
-
Industrials
RXI
AWAY
Communication Services
RXI
AWAY
Basic Materials
RXI
-
AWAY
-
Energy
RXI
-
AWAY
-
Financial Services
RXI
-
AWAY
Healthcare
RXI
-
AWAY
-
Real Estate
RXI
-
AWAY
-
Utilities
RXI
-
AWAY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXI vs. AWAY — Risk / Return Rank
RXI
AWAY
RXI vs. AWAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RXI | AWAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.88 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | -0.56 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | -1.13 | +2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RXI | AWAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | -0.83 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | -0.42 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | -0.17 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
RXI vs. AWAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXI drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, which is greater than AWAY's maximum drawdown of -56.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXI and AWAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXI | AWAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.36% | -56.57% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -32.83% | +17.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.64% | -32.83% | +13.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.78% | -52.49% | +16.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -49.57% | +41.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.54% | -36.15% | +25.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 16.33% | -11.31% |
Volatility
RXI vs. AWAY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) is 5.06%, while ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that RXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXI | AWAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 7.18% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 17.95% | -5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.38% | 22.36% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 26.82% | -5.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 31.81% | -11.68% |
RXI vs. AWAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than AWAY's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RXI vs. AWAY - Dividend Comparison
RXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, while AWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.62% | 1.55% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 0.89% | 0.65% | 1.48% | 1.73% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RXI and AWAY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AWAY has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to RXI (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXI dropped -60.36% vs AWAY's -56.57%.
On 5-year performance, RXI leads with 4.22% vs -11.20% for AWAY. On fees, RXI is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, RXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RXI has performed better with a 4.22% return vs -11.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RXI is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AWAY.
RXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for AWAY.
RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while AWAY tracks Prime Travel Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for RXI and 0.75% for AWAY.
RXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RXI and AWAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer