PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RXI vs. AWAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RXI vs. AWAY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) and AWAY (ETFMG Travel Tech ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - RXI tracks the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index while AWAY tracks the Prime Travel Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RXI returned 3.41%/yr vs -10.70%/yr for AWAY. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AWAY.

Performance

RXI vs. AWAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXI achieves a -6.75% return, which is significantly higher than AWAY's -15.46% return.

RXI

1D
-1.12%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-6.75%
6M
-8.04%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
9.09%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
9.97%

AWAY

1D
-1.53%
1M
6.45%
YTD
-15.46%
6M
-15.99%
1Y
-14.67%
3Y*
1.28%
5Y*
-10.70%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RXI vs. AWAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RXI
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF		-6.75%13.16%17.26%27.57%-29.08%16.32%21.92%
AWAY
ETFMG Travel Tech ETF		-15.46%-3.36%10.44%17.94%-32.25%-5.91%3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between RXI and AWAY is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2020

0.76

The correlation between RXI and AWAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

RXI vs. AWAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RXI
AWAY

Consumer Cyclical

95.0%
64.2%

Technology

3.9%
29.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%

-

Industrials

0.2%
1.2%

Communication Services

0.1%
4.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

RXI
95.0%
AWAY
64.2%

Technology

RXI
3.9%
AWAY
29.0%

Consumer Defensive

RXI
0.8%
AWAY

-

Industrials

RXI
0.2%
AWAY
1.2%

Communication Services

RXI
0.1%
AWAY
4.4%

Basic Materials

RXI

-

AWAY

-

Energy

RXI

-

AWAY

-

Financial Services

RXI

-

AWAY
0.2%

Healthcare

RXI

-

AWAY

-

Real Estate

RXI

-

AWAY

-

Utilities

RXI

-

AWAY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF

ETFMG Travel Tech ETF

Often compared with RXI:
RXI vs. KXIRXI vs. VCRRXI vs. XLPRXI vs. IEDIRXI vs. IBUYRXI vs. FDISRXI vs. VT
Often compared with AWAY:
AWAY vs. JETSAWAY vs. HACKAWAY vs. PEJAWAY vs. EXPEAWAY vs. FLYUAWAY vs. VGTAWAY vs. SOXL

Return for Risk

RXI vs. AWAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RXI
RXI Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
RXI Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
RXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
RXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
AWAY
AWAY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
AWAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWAY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
AWAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWAY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RXI vs. AWAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RXIAWAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.26
-0.66

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.49
-0.81

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.91

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

-0.45

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.81

-0.85

+1.66

RXI vs. AWAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the AWAY Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXI and AWAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RXI vs. AWAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXI drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, which is greater than AWAY's maximum drawdown of -56.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXI and AWAY.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RXIAWAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.36%

-56.57%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.17%

-32.83%

+17.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.64%

-32.83%

+13.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.78%

-51.49%

+15.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.78%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.37%

-49.00%

+38.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.53%

-36.32%

+25.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

17.21%

-11.87%

Volatility

RXI vs. AWAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) is 5.67%, while ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that RXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RXIAWAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

7.03%

-1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.08%

18.51%

-5.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.71%

22.44%

-5.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.02%

26.89%

-5.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

31.74%

-11.65%

RXI vs. AWAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than AWAY's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RXI vs. AWAY - Dividend Comparison

RXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while AWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWAY
ETFMG Travel Tech ETF		0.00%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RXI
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF		1.49%1.55%1.07%1.00%1.00%0.89%0.65%1.48%1.73%1.26%1.77%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

RXI and AWAY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AWAY has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to RXI (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXI dropped -60.36% vs AWAY's -56.57%.

On 5-year performance, RXI leads with 3.41% vs -10.70% for AWAY. On fees, RXI is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, RXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RXI has performed better with a 3.41% return vs -10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RXI is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AWAY.

RXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for AWAY.

RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while AWAY tracks Prime Travel Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for RXI and 0.75% for AWAY.

RXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RXI and AWAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer