RXD vs. BRKW
RXD (ProShares UltraShort Health Care) and BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RXD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Health Care -IND (-200%), while BRKW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. RXD is passively managed, while BRKW is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. RXD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BRKW.
Performance
RXD vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXD achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly higher than BRKW's -6.96% return.
RXD
- 1D
- -5.76%
- 1M
- -8.56%
- YTD
- 4.25%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- -22.97%
- 3Y*
- -6.72%
- 5Y*
- -7.99%
- 10Y*
- -19.08%
BRKW
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- -6.96%
- 6M
- -7.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RXD vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RXD ProShares UltraShort Health Care | 4.25% | -26.13% |
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF | -6.96% | 2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXD and BRKW is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXD vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank
RXD
BRKW
RXD vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Health Care (RXD) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RXD | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RXD | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.65 | -0.30 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
RXD vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXD drawdown since its inception was -99.65%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXD and BRKW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXD | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.65% | -12.64% | -87.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.61% | -9.92% | -89.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.88% | -5.36% | -76.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.14% | — | — |
Volatility
RXD vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXD | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.03% | 17.22% | +12.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.85% | 17.22% | +12.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.00% | 17.22% | +15.78% |
RXD vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison
RXD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
RXD vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison
RXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than BRKW's 24.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF | 24.97% | 14.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RXD ProShares UltraShort Health Care | 2.69% | 3.29% | 4.36% | 3.17% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.73% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RXD and BRKW have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RXD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RXD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKW.
BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 24.97%, compared with 2.69% for RXD.
RXD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BRKW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RXD and 0.99% for BRKW.
Find the right allocation for RXD and BRKW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer