RXD vs. BMNG
RXD (ProShares UltraShort Health Care) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. RXD is passively managed, while BMNG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. RXD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.
Performance
RXD vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXD achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -78.43% return.
RXD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -9.22%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- -23.84%
- 3Y*
- -7.61%
- 5Y*
- -8.19%
- 10Y*
- -19.24%
BMNG
- 1D
- -22.44%
- 1M
- -55.66%
- YTD
- -78.43%
- 6M
- -87.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RXD vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RXD ProShares UltraShort Health Care | 3.09% | -11.09% |
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | -78.43% | -81.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXD and BMNG is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXD vs. BMNG — Risk / Return Rank
RXD
BMNG
RXD vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Health Care (RXD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RXD | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RXD | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.65 | -0.52 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
RXD vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXD drawdown since its inception was -99.65%, roughly equal to the maximum BMNG drawdown of -95.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXD and BMNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXD | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.65% | -95.98% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.62% | -95.98% | -3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.88% | -81.57% | -0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.21% | — | — |
Volatility
RXD vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXD | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.04% | 193.00% | -162.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 193.00% | -163.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.00% | 193.00% | -160.00% |
RXD vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RXD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RXD vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison
RXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, while BMNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RXD ProShares UltraShort Health Care | 2.72% | 3.29% | 4.36% | 3.17% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.73% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RXD and BMNG have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RXD.
RXD has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.00% for BMNG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RXD and 0.75% for BMNG.
Find the right allocation for RXD and BMNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer