RWX vs. DFGR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RWX (SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF) and DFGR (Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. RWX is passively managed, while DFGR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RWX returned 5.03%/yr vs 8.89%/yr for DFGR. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DFGR.

Performance

RWX vs. DFGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) and Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWX achieves a -3.34% return, which is significantly lower than DFGR's 7.61% return.

RWX

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -3.50%
• YTD: -3.34%
• 6M: -2.26%
• 1Y: 3.84%
• 3Y*: 5.03%
• 5Y*: -2.65%
• 10Y*: 0.36%

DFGR

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.00%
• YTD: 7.61%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 10.27%
• 3Y*: 8.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWX vs. DFGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RWX SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF	-3.34%	26.24%	-12.15%	6.25%	0.84%
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF	7.61%	7.65%	1.89%	9.64%	-1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between RWX and DFGR is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2022	0.75

The correlation between RWX and DFGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

RWX vs. DFGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RWX	DFGR
Real Estate	60.5%	99.1%
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	0.0%
Financial Services	2.8%	0.1%
Technology	2.7%	0.1%
Healthcare	1.5%	0.0%
Energy	1.2%	0.0%
Industrials	0.6%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	0.0%

Return for Risk

RWX vs. DFGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWX

RWX Risk / Return Rank: 12
RWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
RWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RWX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
RWX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

DFGR

DFGR Risk / Return Rank: 24
DFGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
DFGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
DFGR Omega Ratio Rank: 23
DFGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
DFGR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWX vs. DFGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) and Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RWX	DFGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	0.87	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	1.26	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.16	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.28	1.13	-0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.85	4.00	-3.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RWX vs. DFGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the DFGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWX and DFGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RWX	DFGR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29	0.87	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.48	-0.45

Drawdowns

RWX vs. DFGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWX drawdown since its inception was -73.62%, which is greater than DFGR's maximum drawdown of -21.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWX and DFGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWX	DFGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.62%	-21.28%	-52.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.58%	-9.15%	-4.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.05%	-17.57%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.76%	-2.76%	-12.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.30%	-6.30%	-14.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.54%	2.58%	+1.96%

Volatility

RWX vs. DFGR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) at 3.61%. This indicates that RWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWX	DFGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	3.61%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.85%	8.75%	+2.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.26%	11.86%	+1.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.84%	15.42%	+0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.49%	15.42%	+1.07%

RWX vs. DFGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGR's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWX vs. DFGR - Dividend Comparison

RWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than DFGR's 3.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF	3.95%	4.05%	3.73%	2.77%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RWX SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF	3.78%	3.65%	4.32%	3.90%	4.05%	4.62%	2.92%	8.94%	5.28%	2.77%	8.74%	2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWX and DFGR in my portfolio?

RWX and DFGR have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RWX or DFGR?

RWX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to DFGR (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWX dropped -73.62% vs DFGR's -21.28%.

Which ETF is better, RWX or DFGR?

On 3-year performance, DFGR leads with 8.89% vs 5.03% for RWX. On fees, DFGR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, DFGR has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RWX or DFGR?

Over the 3-year period, DFGR has performed better with a 8.89% return vs 5.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RWX or DFGR?

DFGR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RWX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RWX or DFGR?

DFGR has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 3.78% for RWX.

What is the main difference between RWX and DFGR?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for RWX and 0.22% for DFGR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.