RWSIX vs. QCFRX
RWSIX (Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund) and QCFRX (AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6) are both Systematic Trend funds. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWSIX charges 1.30%/yr vs 2.07%/yr for QCFRX.
Performance
RWSIX vs. QCFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWSIX achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than QCFRX's 18.63% return.
RWSIX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 9.73%
- 6M
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 17.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- —
QCFRX
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- 18.63%
- 6M
- 19.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RWSIX vs. QCFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RWSIX Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund | 9.73% | 2.84% |
QCFRX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6 | 18.63% | 2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWSIX and QCFRX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWSIX vs. QCFRX — Risk / Return Rank
RWSIX
QCFRX
RWSIX vs. QCFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) and AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6 (QCFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWSIX | QCFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.63 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWSIX | QCFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 2.96 | -2.51 |
Drawdowns
RWSIX vs. QCFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWSIX drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, which is greater than QCFRX's maximum drawdown of -8.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWSIX and QCFRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWSIX | QCFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.90% | -8.00% | -16.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.67% | 0.00% | -8.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -1.57% | -5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | — | — |
Volatility
RWSIX vs. QCFRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWSIX | QCFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.36% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.69% | 14.50% | -3.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.19% | 14.50% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 14.50% | -2.21% |
RWSIX vs. QCFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWSIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QCFRX's 2.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWSIX vs. QCFRX - Dividend Comparison
RWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than QCFRX's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCFRX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6 | 6.61% | 7.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWSIX Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund | 4.11% | 4.51% | 0.00% | 10.35% | 3.41% | 7.81% | 7.78% | 3.05% | 2.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWSIX and QCFRX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RWSIX and QCFRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer