PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCFRX vs. QLFNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6 (QCFRX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCFRX achieves a 15.03% return, which is significantly higher than QLFNX's -1.91% return.


QCFRX

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
15.03%
6M
14.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLFNX

1D
0.60%
1M
1.20%
YTD
-1.91%
6M
-2.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QCFRX
AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6
15.03%2.02%
QLFNX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N
-1.91%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between QCFRX and QLFNX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6 (QCFRX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCFRX drawdown since its inception was -8.00%, smaller than the maximum QLFNX drawdown of -14.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCFRX and QLFNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCFRXQLFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

-14.54%

+6.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.03%

-3.12%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-5.51%

+3.83%

Volatility

QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCFRXQLFNXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

16.62%

-1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

16.62%

-1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.00%

16.62%

-1.62%

QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCFRX has a 2.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QLFNX's 6.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Dividend Comparison

QCFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than QLFNX's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025
QCFRX
AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6
6.82%7.84%
QLFNX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N
0.14%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCFRX and QLFNX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCFRX and QLFNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer