QCFRX vs. QLFNX
QCFRX (AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6) and QLFNX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N) are both mutual funds - QCFRX is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by AQR, while QLFNX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by AQR. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QCFRX charges 2.07%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for QLFNX.
Performance
QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCFRX achieves a 15.03% return, which is significantly higher than QLFNX's -1.91% return.
QCFRX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 15.03%
- 6M
- 14.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLFNX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- -1.91%
- 6M
- -2.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QCFRX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6 | 15.03% | 2.02% |
QLFNX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N | -1.91% | 6.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCFRX and QLFNX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6 (QCFRX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCFRX drawdown since its inception was -8.00%, smaller than the maximum QLFNX drawdown of -14.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCFRX and QLFNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCFRX | QLFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.00% | -14.54% | +6.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.03% | -3.12% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | -5.51% | +3.83% |
Volatility
QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCFRX | QLFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 16.62% | -1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 16.62% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 16.62% | -1.62% |
QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCFRX has a 2.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QLFNX's 6.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCFRX vs. QLFNX - Dividend Comparison
QCFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than QLFNX's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QCFRX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6 | 6.82% | 7.84% |
QLFNX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N | 0.14% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCFRX and QLFNX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QCFRX and QLFNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer