RWSIX vs. QCFNX
RWSIX (Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund) and QCFNX (AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N) are both Systematic Trend funds. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWSIX charges 1.30%/yr vs 2.42%/yr for QCFNX.
Performance
RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWSIX achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than QCFNX's 18.49% return.
RWSIX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 9.73%
- 6M
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 17.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- —
QCFNX
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 18.49%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RWSIX Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund | 9.73% | 2.84% |
QCFNX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N | 18.49% | 1.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWSIX and QCFNX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWSIX vs. QCFNX — Risk / Return Rank
RWSIX
QCFNX
RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) and AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N (QCFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWSIX | QCFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.63 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWSIX | QCFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 2.91 | -2.46 |
Drawdowns
RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWSIX drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, which is greater than QCFNX's maximum drawdown of -8.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWSIX and QCFNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWSIX | QCFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.90% | -8.02% | -16.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.67% | 0.00% | -8.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -1.60% | -5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | — | — |
Volatility
RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWSIX | QCFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.36% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.69% | 14.62% | -3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.19% | 14.62% | -2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 14.62% | -2.33% |
RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWSIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QCFNX's 2.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Dividend Comparison
RWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than QCFNX's 6.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCFNX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N | 6.52% | 7.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWSIX Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund | 4.11% | 4.51% | 0.00% | 10.35% | 3.41% | 7.81% | 7.78% | 3.05% | 2.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWSIX and QCFNX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RWSIX and QCFNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer