PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWSIX vs. QCFNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) and AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N (QCFNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWSIX achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than QCFNX's 18.49% return.


RWSIX

1D
0.12%
1M
3.21%
YTD
9.73%
6M
10.72%
1Y
17.30%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*

QCFNX

1D
0.69%
1M
6.14%
YTD
18.49%
6M
19.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RWSIX and QCFNX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWSIX vs. QCFNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWSIX
RWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
RWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
RWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

QCFNX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) and AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N (QCFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWSIXQCFNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.63

RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWSIXQCFNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

2.91

-2.46

Drawdowns

RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWSIX drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, which is greater than QCFNX's maximum drawdown of -8.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWSIX and QCFNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWSIXQCFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.90%

-8.02%

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.67%

0.00%

-8.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-1.60%

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

Volatility

RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWSIXQCFNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

14.62%

-3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.19%

14.62%

-2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.29%

14.62%

-2.33%

RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWSIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QCFNX's 2.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWSIX vs. QCFNX - Dividend Comparison

RWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than QCFNX's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QCFNX
AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N
6.52%7.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RWSIX
Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund
4.11%4.51%0.00%10.35%3.41%7.81%7.78%3.05%2.51%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWSIX and QCFNX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWSIX and QCFNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer