PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWR vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWR vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWR achieves a 16.42% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 21.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RWR has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 5.53%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.19% annualized return.


RWR

1D
0.25%
1M
2.21%
YTD
16.42%
6M
15.89%
1Y
19.36%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
4.85%
10Y*
5.53%

XLE

1D
-1.63%
1M
-9.30%
YTD
21.47%
6M
22.40%
1Y
30.11%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
18.36%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWR vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
16.42%3.20%7.74%13.76%-26.09%45.47%-11.40%22.71%-4.47%3.47%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
21.47%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RWR and XLE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2001

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between RWR and XLE has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWR vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWR
RWR Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
RWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWR vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWRXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.15

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.24

6.33

+1.91

RWR vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWR and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWR vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWRXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.92%

-71.26%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-14.05%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.85%

-20.14%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.58%

-26.04%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.39%

-66.81%

+22.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-13.75%

+13.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.08%

-17.96%

+4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

4.77%

-2.40%

Volatility

RWR vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) is 5.42%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that RWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWRXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

7.16%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

16.92%

-6.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

20.83%

-6.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.05%

25.99%

-6.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.55%

29.60%

-8.05%

RWR vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RWR vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than XLE's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
3.36%3.78%3.76%3.75%3.81%2.79%3.73%3.36%4.19%3.05%4.39%3.17%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.83%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWR and XLE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to RWR (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWR dropped -74.92% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.19% vs 5.53% for RWR. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RWR has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for RWR.

RWR has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 2.83% for XLE.

RWR is categorized as REIT, while XLE is Energy Equities. RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RWR and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWR and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer