PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWR vs. PSCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWR vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWR achieves a 21.53% return, which is significantly higher than PSCC's 19.02% return. Over the past 10 years, RWR has underperformed PSCC with an annualized return of 5.12%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 6.84% annualized return.


RWR

1D
0.36%
1M
7.35%
6M
18.04%
YTD
21.53%
1Y
25.39%
3Y*
11.84%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
5.12%
ALL TIME*
8.95%

PSCC

1D
0.64%
1M
5.06%
6M
14.02%
YTD
19.02%
1Y
7.23%
3Y*
1.88%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
6.84%
ALL TIME*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWR vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
21.53%3.20%7.74%13.76%-26.09%45.47%-11.40%22.71%-4.47%3.47%
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
19.02%-16.47%0.98%14.83%-6.66%28.82%11.17%17.39%-6.72%9.72%

Correlation

The correlation between RWR and PSCC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.51

The correlation between RWR and PSCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWR vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWR
RWR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCC
PSCC Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWR vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWRPSCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.08

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

0.48

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

0.83

+9.95

RWR vs. PSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the PSCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWR and PSCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWR vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, which is greater than PSCC's maximum drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and PSCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWRPSCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.92%

-33.61%

-41.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-15.17%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.85%

-23.36%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.58%

-23.36%

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.39%

-33.61%

-10.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-7.07%

+7.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.05%

-6.01%

-7.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

8.69%

-6.33%

Volatility

RWR vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) is 4.70%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that RWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWRPSCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

6.23%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

12.11%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.29%

16.80%

-2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.03%

18.32%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

19.36%

+2.21%

RWR vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWR vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison

RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than PSCC's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
1.64%2.35%1.88%1.49%1.29%1.21%1.59%1.77%0.94%1.25%1.48%1.34%
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
3.21%3.78%3.76%3.75%3.81%2.79%3.73%3.36%4.19%3.05%4.39%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWR and PSCC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCC has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to RWR (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWR dropped -74.92% vs PSCC's -33.61%.

On 10-year performance, PSCC leads with 6.84% vs 5.12% for RWR. On fees, RWR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RWR has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSCC has performed better with a 6.84% return vs 5.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RWR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.

RWR has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 1.64% for PSCC.

RWR is categorized as REIT, while PSCC is Consumer Staples Equities. RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, while PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RWR and 0.29% for PSCC.

RWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWR and PSCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer