RWR vs. NETL
RWR (SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF) and NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - RWR tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index while NETL tracks the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RWR returned 4.15%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for NETL. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RWR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NETL.
Performance
RWR vs. NETL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWR achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly higher than NETL's 10.34% return.
RWR
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 11.08%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 15.44%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.15%
- 10Y*
- 5.15%
NETL
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 11.59%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
RWR vs. NETL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 11.08% | 3.20% | 7.74% | 13.76% | -26.09% | 45.47% | -11.40% | 7.33% |
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 10.34% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 2.69% | -16.16% | 27.36% | -0.73% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWR and NETL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between RWR and NETL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
RWR vs. NETL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RWR
NETL
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Real Estate
RWR
NETL
Financial Services
RWR
NETL
-
Utilities
RWR
NETL
-
Basic Materials
RWR
-
NETL
-
Communication Services
RWR
-
NETL
-
Consumer Cyclical
RWR
-
NETL
-
Consumer Defensive
RWR
-
NETL
-
Energy
RWR
-
NETL
-
Healthcare
RWR
-
NETL
-
Industrials
RWR
-
NETL
-
Technology
RWR
-
NETL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWR vs. NETL — Risk / Return Rank
RWR
NETL
RWR vs. NETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWR | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.15 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 1.27 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.55 | 3.99 | +2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWR | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.86 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.07 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.20 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
RWR vs. NETL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, which is greater than NETL's maximum drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and NETL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWR | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.92% | -51.48% | -23.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -9.16% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.85% | -19.30% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.58% | -30.74% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -3.68% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.11% | -11.65% | -1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 2.91% | -0.55% |
Volatility
RWR vs. NETL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) at 3.66%. This indicates that RWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWR | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 3.66% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 9.66% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 13.57% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 17.94% | +1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 25.92% | -4.41% |
RWR vs. NETL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NETL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWR vs. NETL - Dividend Comparison
RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than NETL's 4.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.83% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 3.44% | 3.78% | 3.76% | 3.75% | 3.81% | 2.79% | 3.73% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 3.05% | 4.39% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWR and NETL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWR has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to NETL (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWR dropped -74.92% vs NETL's -51.48%.
On 5-year performance, RWR leads with 4.15% vs 1.33% for NETL. On fees, RWR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, NETL has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RWR has performed better with a 4.15% return vs 1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RWR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NETL.
NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 3.44% for RWR.
RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, while NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RWR and 0.60% for NETL.
RWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWR and NETL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer