PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWR vs. NETL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWR vs. NETL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWR achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly higher than NETL's 10.34% return.


RWR

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
11.08%
6M
9.50%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
4.15%
10Y*
5.15%

NETL

1D
-1.14%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
10.34%
6M
9.20%
1Y
11.59%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
1.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWR vs. NETL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
11.08%3.20%7.74%13.76%-26.09%45.47%-11.40%7.33%
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
10.34%6.05%-1.08%2.69%-16.16%27.36%-0.73%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between RWR and NETL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019

0.88

The correlation between RWR and NETL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

RWR vs. NETL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWR
NETL

Real Estate

98.6%
100.0%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Real Estate

RWR
98.6%
NETL
100.0%

Financial Services

RWR
0.0%
NETL

-

Utilities

RWR
0.0%
NETL

-

Basic Materials

RWR

-

NETL

-

Communication Services

RWR

-

NETL

-

Consumer Cyclical

RWR

-

NETL

-

Consumer Defensive

RWR

-

NETL

-

Energy

RWR

-

NETL

-

Healthcare

RWR

-

NETL

-

Industrials

RWR

-

NETL

-

Technology

RWR

-

NETL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWR vs. NETL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWR
RWR Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
RWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWR Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

NETL
NETL Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NETL Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NETL Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWR vs. NETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWRNETLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.15

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.27

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

3.99

+2.56

RWR vs. NETL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the NETL Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWR and NETL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWRNETLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

0.86

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.07

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.20

+0.12

Drawdowns

RWR vs. NETL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, which is greater than NETL's maximum drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and NETL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWRNETLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.92%

-51.48%

-23.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-9.16%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.85%

-19.30%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.58%

-30.74%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-3.68%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.11%

-11.65%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.91%

-0.55%

Volatility

RWR vs. NETL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) at 3.66%. This indicates that RWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWRNETLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

3.66%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

9.66%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

13.57%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.01%

17.94%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

25.92%

-4.41%

RWR vs. NETL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NETL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWR vs. NETL - Dividend Comparison

RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than NETL's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
4.83%5.12%5.08%4.57%4.47%4.03%3.98%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
3.44%3.78%3.76%3.75%3.81%2.79%3.73%3.36%4.19%3.05%4.39%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWR and NETL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWR has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to NETL (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWR dropped -74.92% vs NETL's -51.48%.

On 5-year performance, RWR leads with 4.15% vs 1.33% for NETL. On fees, RWR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, NETL has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RWR has performed better with a 4.15% return vs 1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RWR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NETL.

NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 3.44% for RWR.

RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, while NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RWR and 0.60% for NETL.

RWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWR and NETL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer