RWR vs. NETL
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL).
RWR and NETL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RWR is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. It was launched on Apr 23, 2001. NETL is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. It was launched on Mar 22, 2019. Both RWR and NETL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RWR vs. NETL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RWR vs. NETL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 3.43% | 3.20% | 7.74% | 13.76% | -26.09% | 45.47% | -11.40% | 7.33% |
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 5.36% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 2.69% | -16.16% | 27.36% | -0.73% | 13.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWR achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than NETL's 5.36% return.
RWR
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -6.06%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 2.55%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.36%
NETL
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -7.51%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 2.83%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.35%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RWR vs. NETL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NETL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RWR vs. NETL — Risk / Return Rank
RWR
NETL
RWR vs. NETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWR | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 0.23 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.58 | 0.43 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.05 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 0.40 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.14 | 1.43 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWR | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.23 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.13 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.17 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between RWR and NETL is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RWR vs. NETL - Dividend Comparison
RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than NETL's 4.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 3.69% | 3.78% | 3.76% | 3.75% | 3.81% | 2.79% | 3.73% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 3.05% | 4.39% | 3.17% |
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.98% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RWR vs. NETL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, which is greater than NETL's maximum drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and NETL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWR | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.92% | -51.48% | -23.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -11.76% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.58% | -30.74% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.44% | -7.97% | +1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.19% | -11.89% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 3.40% | -0.27% |
Volatility
RWR vs. NETL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) have volatilities of 4.57% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RWR | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 4.60% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 9.78% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.01% | 15.88% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 18.05% | +0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 26.16% | -4.65% |