RWR vs. BLDG
RWR (State Street SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. RWR is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RWR returned 4.74%/yr vs 3.43%/yr for BLDG. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RWR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
RWR vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWR achieves a 19.80% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's 13.98% return.
RWR
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 16.61%
- YTD
- 19.80%
- 1Y
- 26.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.74%
- 10Y*
- 5.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.88%
BLDG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- YTD
- 13.98%
- 1Y
- 17.84%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $91.83K | $83.90K | $581.35K | |
| $43.72M | $37.86M | $34.73M |
RWR vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWR State Street SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 19.80% | 3.20% | 7.74% | 13.76% | -26.09% | 45.47% | 17.42% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 13.98% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWR and BLDG is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | 0.85 |
The correlation between RWR and BLDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWR vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
RWR
BLDG
RWR vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWR | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.26 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 1.71 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | 6.03 | +5.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWR vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and BLDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWR | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.92% | -27.25% | -47.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -10.08% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.85% | -18.57% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.58% | -27.25% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -1.92% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.03% | -8.99% | -4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 2.85% | -0.59% |
Volatility
RWR vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 3.77%. This indicates that RWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWR | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 3.77% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 9.59% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.14% | 11.52% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 15.23% | +3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 15.50% | +6.07% |
RWR vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWR vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than BLDG's 5.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.15% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWR State Street SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 3.26% | 3.78% | 3.76% | 3.75% | 3.81% | 2.79% | 3.73% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 3.05% | 4.39% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWR and BLDG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWR has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to BLDG (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWR dropped -74.92% vs BLDG's -27.25%.
On 5-year performance, RWR leads with 4.74% vs 3.43% for BLDG. On fees, RWR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BLDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RWR has performed better with a 4.74% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RWR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 3.26% for RWR.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RWR and 0.59% for BLDG.
RWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWR and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer