PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWMGX vs. BFMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWMGX vs. BFMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) and BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio (BFMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWMGX achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly higher than BFMSX's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, RWMGX has outperformed BFMSX with an annualized return of 13.17%, while BFMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.29% annualized return.


RWMGX

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.77%
YTD
5.55%
6M
5.81%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
13.17%

BFMSX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.32%
1Y
4.41%
3Y*
5.02%
5Y*
2.05%
10Y*
2.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWMGX vs. BFMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWMGX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6
5.55%17.56%19.35%17.58%-8.17%28.84%8.02%25.78%-5.91%20.38%
BFMSX
BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio
0.81%6.20%4.94%4.96%-5.34%-0.33%3.47%4.75%1.15%1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between RWMGX and BFMSX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.03

Over the past year, RWMGX and BFMSX have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWMGX vs. BFMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWMGX
RWMGX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
RWMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
RWMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BFMSX
BFMSX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BFMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BFMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWMGX vs. BFMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) and BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio (BFMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWMGXBFMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.57

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.98

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.06

13.58

-4.52

RWMGX vs. BFMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the BFMSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWMGX and BFMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWMGXBFMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.14

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.88

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

1.09

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.60

-0.78

Drawdowns

RWMGX vs. BFMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWMGX drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than BFMSX's maximum drawdown of -12.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWMGX and BFMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWMGXBFMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-12.70%

-21.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-1.52%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.61%

-1.52%

-13.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.46%

-7.96%

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-7.96%

-26.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.11%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-0.82%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

0.33%

+1.59%

Volatility

RWMGX vs. BFMSX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio (BFMSX) at 0.65%. This indicates that RWMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWMGXBFMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

0.65%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

1.65%

+6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

2.12%

+8.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.10%

2.35%

+11.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.32%

2.11%

+14.21%

RWMGX vs. BFMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWMGX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than BFMSX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWMGX vs. BFMSX - Dividend Comparison

RWMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.86%, more than BFMSX's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFMSX
BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio
4.67%4.56%4.14%3.34%2.67%1.23%2.04%2.63%2.51%2.17%1.76%1.87%
RWMGX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6
9.86%10.36%10.36%6.42%6.63%6.33%3.35%6.91%4.67%7.52%6.66%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWMGX and BFMSX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWMGX has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to BFMSX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWMGX dropped -34.64% vs BFMSX's -12.70%.

BFMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWMGX and BFMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer