BFMSX vs. TNSHX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BFMSX (BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio) and TNSHX (TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, BFMSX returned 2.23%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for TNSHX. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BFMSX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for TNSHX.

Performance

BFMSX vs. TNSHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio (BFMSX) and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFMSX achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly higher than TNSHX's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, BFMSX has outperformed TNSHX with an annualized return of 2.23%, while TNSHX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.80% annualized return.

BFMSX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.22%
• 6M: 0.37%
• YTD: 0.86%
• 1Y: 3.19%
• 3Y*: 5.02%
• 5Y*: 2.10%
• 10Y*: 2.23%
• ALL TIME*: 3.35%

TNSHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.21%
• 6M: 0.39%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 1Y: 2.58%
• 3Y*: 4.21%
• 5Y*: 1.82%
• 10Y*: 1.80%
• ALL TIME*: 1.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BFMSX BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BFMSX vs. TNSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BFMSX BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio	0.86%	6.20%	4.94%	4.96%	-5.34%	-0.33%	3.47%	4.75%	1.15%	1.98%
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund	0.63%	5.31%	4.03%	4.05%	-3.96%	-0.57%	3.26%	4.05%	1.31%	0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BFMSX and TNSHX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.71

The correlation between BFMSX and TNSHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BFMSX vs. TNSHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BFMSX

BFMSX Risk / Return Rank: 84
BFMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
BFMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
BFMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
BFMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
BFMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

TNSHX

TNSHX Risk / Return Rank: 85
TNSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
TNSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
TNSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
TNSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
TNSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BFMSX vs. TNSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio (BFMSX) and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFMSX	TNSHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.83	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	3.36	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.44	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	3.01	-0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.61	11.11	+0.50

BFMSX vs. TNSHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the TNSHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFMSX and TNSHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BFMSX vs. TNSHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFMSX drawdown since its inception was -12.70%, which is greater than TNSHX's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFMSX and TNSHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFMSX	TNSHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.70%	-5.99%	-6.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.52%	-1.13%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.52%	-1.13%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.96%	-5.99%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-7.96%	-5.99%	-1.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-0.21%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.82%	-0.88%	+0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	0.31%	+0.03%

Volatility

BFMSX vs. TNSHX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio (BFMSX) has a higher volatility of 0.45% compared to TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) at 0.39%. This indicates that BFMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BFMSX	TNSHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.45%	0.39%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.75%	1.43%	+0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15%	1.86%	+0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.37%	2.26%	+0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.12%	1.82%	+0.30%

BFMSX vs. TNSHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFMSX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than TNSHX's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFMSX vs. TNSHX - Dividend Comparison

BFMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than TNSHX's 3.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BFMSX BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio	4.27%	4.56%	4.14%	3.34%	2.67%	1.23%	2.04%	2.63%	2.51%	2.17%	1.76%	1.87%
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund	3.72%	4.22%	3.94%	2.68%	1.00%	1.03%	1.81%	2.45%	1.80%	1.31%	0.98%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFMSX and TNSHX in my portfolio?

BFMSX and TNSHX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BFMSX or TNSHX?

BFMSX has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to TNSHX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFMSX dropped -12.70% vs TNSHX's -5.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BFMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.