RWM vs. SARK
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK).
RWM and SARK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RWM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 (-100%). It was launched on Jan 23, 2007. SARK is an actively managed fund by AXS. It was launched on Nov 5, 2021.
Performance
RWM vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RWM vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000 | -0.52% | -9.40% | -5.91% | -10.43% | 18.34% | 6.92% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 9.55% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 20.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWM achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than SARK's 9.55% return.
RWM
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -19.15%
- 3Y*
- -8.15%
- 5Y*
- -2.92%
- 10Y*
- -11.01%
SARK
- 1D
- -6.28%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- 9.55%
- 6M
- 18.96%
- 1Y
- -34.21%
- 3Y*
- -27.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RWM vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RWM vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
RWM
SARK
RWM vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWM | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | -0.74 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | -0.95 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.89 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | -0.52 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | -0.65 | -0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWM | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | -0.74 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | -0.19 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between RWM and SARK is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RWM vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
RWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than SARK's 2.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000 | 3.57% | 3.97% | 6.03% | 4.78% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.55% | 0.87% | 0.07% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 2.57% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RWM vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWM drawdown since its inception was -95.12%, which is greater than SARK's maximum drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWM and SARK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWM | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.12% | -81.07% | -14.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.53% | -59.44% | +24.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.70% | -75.82% | -18.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.85% | -45.17% | -28.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.23% | 47.87% | -22.64% |
Volatility
RWM vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) is 7.47%, while Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a volatility of 12.51%. This indicates that RWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RWM | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 12.51% | -5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.43% | 27.14% | -12.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.18% | 46.51% | -23.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 56.97% | -34.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.07% | 56.97% | -33.90% |